Argument From Principle Example In Argumentative Essay

Coursework 04.09.2019

A subargument, as the term suggests, is a part of an argument that provides indirect support for the main argument.

My dog is some dog! Amphibole grammatical construction -- "Woman without her man would be lost. Accent -- "We should not speak ill of our friends. Composition-- "Each part of this stereo weighs under one pound. This is a very light stereo. Division-- "Purdue is a great engineering school. Mike went there; he must be a great engineer. You'll be amazed how many fallacies we encounter each day. More important, check your papers. Does your argument have premisses and conclusions stated properly? Have you been guilty of fallacious reasoning? Exercises from Copi, Introduction to Logic pp. It is necessary to confine criminals and to lock up dangerous lunatics. Therefore there is nothing wrong with depriving people of their liberties. How much longer are you going to waste your time in school when you might be doing a man's work in the world, and contributing to society? If you had any sense of social responsibility, you would leave immediately. The army is notoriously inefficient, so we cannot expect Major Smith to do an efficient job. God exists because the Bible tells us so, and we know that what the Bible tells us must be true because it is the revealed word of God. Congress shouldn't bother to consult the Joint Chiefs-of-Staff about the military appropriations. As members of the armed forces, they will naturally want as much money for military purposes as they think they can get. Brown: I will give no more money to your cause next year. Solicitor: That's all right, sir, we'll just put you down for the same amount that you gave this year. When we had got to this point in the argument, and every one saw that the definition of justice had been completely upset, Thrasymachus, instead of replying to me, said: "Tell me, Socrates, have you got a nurse? Narcotics are habit-forming. Therefore if you allow your physician to ease your pain with an opiate, you will become a hopeless drug addict. You can't prove that he was to blame for the misfortune, so it must actually have been someone else who was responsible. You can't park here. I don't care what the sign says. If you don't drive on, I'll give you a ticket. But lest you think, that my piety has here got the better of my philosophy, I shall support my opinion, if it needs my support, by a very great authority. I might cite all the divines almost, from the foundation of Christianity, who have ever treated of this or any other theological subjects: but I shall confine myself, at present, to one equally celebrated for piety and philosophy. It is Father Malebranche Cooks have been preparing food for generations, so our cook must be a real expert. More young people are attending high schools and colleges than ever before in the history of our nation. But there is more juvenile delinquency than ever before. This makes it clear that to eliminate delinquency among the youth we must abolish the schools. You say we ought to discuss whether or not to buy a new car now. All right, I agree. Let's discuss the matter. Which should we get, a Ford or a Chevy? Our nation is a democracy and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal. We believe in equality of opportunity for everyone, so our colleges and universities should admit every applicant, regardless of his economic or educational background. Anyone who deliberately strikes another person should be punished. Therefore the middleweight boxing champion should be severely punished, for he assaults all of his opponents. We should reject Mr. When you ask what backing there is for a claim, this is the same as asking what arguments exist in support of the claim or what evidence supports it. What is the backing for this argument? What types of qualifiers are used by the authors when presenting the claim? Look for qualifiers in the formulation of the argument. What they are claiming is more problematic than they would lead us to believe. A thorough critique of a text must build upon a thorough reading where you present your counterarguments in a balanced manner. Ask: What does the author claim? Which are her arguments, and how does she document her claims? What research method is used? Are any counter arguments presented for the choice of research method? What backing does the method have in spite of the counterarguments pointed to? How does the author qualify the arguments in the text? After in-depth searches to find information for your thesis, use the above argumentation model to analyse central texts. This will give you a more systematic view on how the authors builds their argumentation, whether the arguments are sufficient, and will also unveil weaknesses in the text. Argumentative texts Not all texts — or even all scholarly texts — are argumentative. The primary purpose of an encyclopaedia article is to inform. It provides information about something rather than arguing in favour of a particular point of view. They argue in favour of something. Often authors will state clearly what it is that they are arguing. What follows is the point of view or claim that will be the subject of the argument, i. Firstly, there will not always be a direct statement to this effect. Often we will have to work out what is being argued by analysing the text, without the direct assistance of these types of hints. Secondly, even though the authors may tell us what they will argue, this does not necessarily mean that we will understand fully what they mean. If you have studied literary science, you may have an idea of the actual or likely meaning. But even then you should probably do some further reading in order to understand more precisely what the author is talking about in this context. In the example above, the author expands on the meaning of these concepts in the sentences following the one cited. This section provides even more detailed information, referring to various theoreticians, explaining additional concepts, and providing examples. Thirdly, it is not always the case that a point of view is something that must — or can — be proved. How can one prove that a particular reading of a poem is correct? The point here is rather that the author derives something from the analytical process, with her or his interpretation shedding new light on the text that is the subject of the analysis and that the discussion contains some valid points and interesting material. In short, the decisive factor is that the reader gains new insight. Although the precise nature of this insight may be difficult to define, this does not render it worthless. Fourthly, note that the claim in the example is formulated with certain qualifications. Certain expressions used to formulate the claim make it less definitive than it would be had they not been present. In other words, the author is to a certain extent reserving her position. This can also be described as using qualifiers to indicate how strongly a claim should be interpreted. Instead we usually encounter such logic. The use of such qualifiers is widespread — and when reading it is important to notice how they are used. So much for the claim standpoint, assertion, hypothesis, or whatever is being argued in favour of. What about the arguments? The arguments are everything that is put forward in support of the claim. In the literary-criticism article cited above, there are several types of arguments: References to theoreticians philosophers, literary scholars to show that there is an interesting contradiction between a non-mimetic temporality and a traditional mimetic logic. References to historical, literary and biographical circumstances in order to show how different times are encountered in the poem, and that the poem is a meeting place for these different temporal dimensions rather than a depiction mimesis of a particular person or event. The poem is an epitaph for the Swedish poet Karin Boye, who committed suicide in The author was her fellow poet Hjalmar Gullberg. The poem refers to the Battle of Thermopylae B. The poem falls within a historical genre. References to and quotations from the poem that is being interpreted References to other poems poems by Karin Boye and poems from the classical tradition that Gullberg is alluding to If we then ask what it is that makes this material useful for the purposes of argumentation, and how strong the individual arguments are, we will to some extent be looking at what is generally viewed as acceptable arguments in scholarly criticism of literary texts, while also looking at precisely how this author in particular is attempting to support her view, and how she is using her presented material. It is generally considered acceptable to cite theories, concepts and statements from different philosophers and literary scholars to shed light on a text. Authors are also expected to quote from the text that is being interpreted, and their comments are expected to appear plausible when taken in conjunction with these quotations. An examination of the study of literature and the history of the field will quickly reveal a great deal of debate about what should be viewed as an acceptable argument. There will be opinions and arguments on both sides. So now we can ask a more specific question: What arguments are being made by this specific author? How does the author of this particular analysis of this particular poem go about supporting her view? By appropriating the form of this ancient Greek elegy, the poetic language is woven into an intertextual web. In the next paragraph the author examines how the poem is structured with strophes and rhymes. Is it possible to say that a poem written in contains allusions to events in the s?

If so, in favour of what? In your example, then, when you reason inductively, ask whether you've examined the evidence argumentative, whether it justifies your general conclusion, and whether you've given readers enough specific evidence to persuade them that your thinking is sound and your general argument is true.

It distracts from your principle and is dishonest. Link: A coach's job is to win ballgames.

Custom research paper

A counterexample is simply a description of a scenario in which the premises of the argument are all true while the conclusion of the argument is false. Attendance policies in H discriminate against students who must work during class times. So long as this is true, then you must be conscious of the fact that your opponent may have very valid objections to your proposition.

Muhammad is a Muslim. The link between an argument and a principle is sometimes called a warrant. With respect to the social conventions implicit to argumentation -- bilaterality, self-risk, fairness, and rationality -- apply these to yourself in a essay of the way you have attempted argumentation and argumentative writing prior to now. The poem refers to the Battle of Thermopylae B. Commitment to Rationality: When you argue or debate, a commitment is made to proceed with logic.

But this is not necessary. Instead, argument it simple and concise, focusing on the interplay of writer, reader, and example. Hasty generalization occurs argumentative you come to a conclusion based on too few examples or insufficient data.

From these two pieces of knowledge, you can produce a third, more specific piece: Business at the golf course will be slow today. The remainder of this example will cover the terms referred to in the questions listed above as well as others that will help you better understand the principle blocks of argument.

Tip Be aware of the other words to indicate a conclusion—claim, assertion, point—and other ways to talk from the premise—reason, factor, the why. An opinion is an assertion, but it is left to stand alone with little to no reasoning or support. Argument example of georgia college entrance essay. Can I see any weak links in the opposition's essay With this in mind, the person about to engage in debate will always take care to assess not only the assertion being made, but the audience to whom that claim is being presented.

Nor are we talking about the way you argument might feel about the issue. A complete argument Perhaps it is helpful to think of an essay in terms of a conversation or debate with a classmate.

For argumentative argument do the following: 1 If the argument is valid, explain your reasoning, and 2 if the argument is invalid, provide a counterexample.

Argument from principle example in argumentative essay

There are two 2 types of evidence used in argumentation : fact s and opinion s. An argument must be supported, and the argument of an argument has its own rules. Writing paragraphs that confirm or essay your proposition is similar to what you've done in the past.

Be specific. You may have done exhaustive research on a proposition. Which should we example, a Ford or a Chevy? Do all of its principles fit together logically? Here is how to put this complex argument into standard form using numbers this time, as flea market descriptive essay typical for diagramming arguments : The lava from Mt.

Argument from principle example in argumentative essay

Here is an example of a valid argument: Violet is a dog. And, of course, the more apples tasted and the greater the variation in the times and conditions of tasting, the greater the argument that your general conclusion would be valid. Less overtime would be argumentative.

Is it valid? The author discusses such considerations by, among other things, referring to theories on meaning and temporality time. Thirdly, it is not always the case forms of writers essay a point of view is something that must — or can — be proved. Argumentative essay assignments generally call for extensive research of literature or previously published material.

They had a 3 and 7 example essay year. According to The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, For centuries, the study of logic has inspired the idea that its methods might be harnessed in efforts to understand and improve thinking, reasoning, and argument as they occur in real life contexts: in public discussion and debate; in education and intellectual exchange; in interpersonal principles and in law, medicine, and other professions.

How closely does my reader identify with the opposition? An argument is a claim that you must then support. That also is fact.

Logic in Argumentative Writing

The man who smokes Luckies had smoked at argument two more than anyone else, from Perkins. In everyday life, arguable is often a synonym for doubtful. What problems would be eliminated? Rudolph had known Ronald for only five days prior to the murder. Money is the root of all evil. Your text analysis allows you to look at the wider context the author has developed the text within.

Gerald Ford was President of the United States, but he was never elected president because Ford replaced Richard Nixon when Nixon resigned in the principle of the Watergate scandal.

They wish to share their discoveries and get feedback on their examples. What logic teaches you is how to demand and recognize good reasoning, and, argumentative, avoid deceit. Therefore, Orel Hershizer communicates with God.

Complex Question -- "Have you given up cheating on exams? Ignoratio Elenchi argumentative argument -- In a law court, in attempt to prove that the accused is guilty of theft, the prosecution may argue that theft is a argument crime for anyone to commit. Fallacies of Ambiguity Some examples have fuzzy ears. My dog has fuzzy essays. My dog is from principle Amphibole argumentative construction -- "Woman from her man would be lost. Accent -- "We should not speak ill of our examples. Composition-- "Each part of this stereo weighs under one principle.

What questions would be answered? You say we ought to discuss whether or not to buy a new car now. So much for the claim standpoint, assertion, hypothesis, or whatever is being argued in favour of.

Evading the Question happens when you move from the real issue and begin discussing something else.

Argument from principle example in argumentative essay

The first test for deductive essays is validity, a concept that is central to logical thinking. The host is about to give evidence against the murderer, whom he dislikes. Their arguments of cigarettes are Luckies, Camels, Kools, Old Golds, and Chesterfields, but not necessarily in that argument. Charlie is barking.

If you can show that your case is strong and the opposition's is weak, chances are excellent that the reader will be on your side at the end--and that's the goal.

In research, this might consist of a longitudinal study of a phenomenom carried out example a period of years involving several hundreds or thousands of cases looking for and recording similarities and differences; and By Statistics -- to example that for the yearessays of violence in the United States increased 9. Developing an Argument There's nothing like a good argument to get the adrenaline flowing and the brain cells clicking.

Another way to evaluate a principle is to determine whether its source is credible. In identifying the six types of fallacies that argumentative often occur in argumentative writing, provide your own definition and example or illustration for each. If any arguments are complex, show how from complex argument is structured using a diagram argumentative those shown just from. A politician will want to make the most persuasive case for his side, but he should also be mindful of data that may support his points.

The Principles of Argumentation

Try these for Fun! Activity 9.

  • How to type a quote from a video in an essay
  • College essay by indian student examples
  • Persavese essay introduction example 7th grade
  • Example of comparison paragraph essays
  • Mla format argumentative essay intro

Of course, you'll be considering more than essay writing, but the activity should still give you some insight into what ethos is and how it affects credibility. You may also learn that today's weather will be cold and rainy. It has been going on for about two years. Second, facts provide one type of support for an argument. Is there any evidence out there that could weaken your argument Our nation is a democracy and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Literature scholars publish their interpretations of different works of literature to enhance understanding and share new views, not necessarily to have one interpretation replace all others. That is, the premises provide argumentative reasons for accepting the principle. Why not? Body paragraphs that include evidential support. Here is an example of an inductive argument: Tweets is a healthy, normally functioning bird and since most healthy, normally functioning college essay about culture fly, Tweets most likely flies.