How Will Technology Affect Us In The Future Essay

Criticism 12.08.2019

However I do not wholly agree that technological innovation has not contributed to improve humanity. The development of technology helps to enhance quality of life but also introduces more bright future, solving problems that we confront today.

Best college for writers

Technology has aided in making day to day life simpler, as well as keep us all connected. Organizations today continue to grow using all the newest technological advancements. Organizations today continue to grow using the newest technological advancements. It was said that the advancements to technology was making everyday life effortless for individuals from communication to entertainment. Without the aid of technology, life would be more laborious because we have become dependent on technology to assist us with various tasks. Many years ago there were not very many forms of technology that existed. People often used type writers, went, dancing, did puzzle, and played board games for entertainment. Nowadays, the use of computers has become extremely popular. If an individual is not using a computer for some form on entertainment, they are most likely using it for something along the lines of school or work. Quantum computing will put us in a whole new world of speed when it comes to computers and it 's a safe bet that most of the major tech companies are racing towards figuring out how to get this technology into the consumers hands for the right price. Cell phones - Cell phones are everywhere now and it seems regardless of where you look there will be a cell phone in your view. Besides, Siemens already have similar prototypes to this technology for different market, but did not proceed in the small animal market, indicating lack of interest for new technology in this market. Since this definition was coined, Wearable Technology has benefited from years of technological miniaturization, making the likelihood of coming across a backpack computer incredibly small; however the definition is a perfect analogy of developments seen in the industry over the past few decades. The most useful is business technology because without the people in the background creating and developing the technology, there would not be any technology at home. There is a variety of different modules in developing technology and its encryptions that prevents the systems data from being public to anyone to use for their own personal use. What is technology? Technology is the making, modification, usage, and knowledge of tools, machines, techniques, and methods to solve a problem and to achieve a goal. Technology is rapidly advancing every day to create a more efficient human lifestyle. However, technology is advancing rapidly to the point where it is becoming too intelligent, unpredictable, and uncontrollable for the human creators to control. Over the years technology has improved and become a huge part of everyone's daily life. We use technology to extend our abilities outside of what a normal person knows and can do. We apply technology in almost everything we do in our lives. One of the best and biggest technological advancements for this decade is the creation of Smart Technology. Nonetheless, it matters that the theory of liberal society and the anthropology of innovation have serious trouble with children and with future generations. Our theories do shape our ideals and our actions, and affect our sense of what is legitimate and what is desirable. The most common answer to the liberal difficulty with the child is to treat children as the charge and almost as the property of parents, and so to apply the language of rights to them second hand. This often makes good sense, but it also has the effect of subsuming the interests of the child within those of the parents, so that in principle our picture of the world can still consist purely of rational adults and their needs and wants. That way, we can continue to imagine the future without considering the distinctive challenges and the peculiar promise and hope that result from the presence of children in society. But the absence of children in this vision of the future results from more than a gap in a theory. Even more important is the very practical way in which children pose a hindrance to any vision of progress. Regardless of how much intellectual and material progress any society may make, every new child entering that society will still enter with essentially the same native intellectual and material equipment as any other child born in any other place at any other time in the history of the human race. Raising such children to the level of their society is, to put it mildly, a distraction from the forward path. And a failure to initiate the next generation of children into the ways of civilization would not only delay or derail innovation, it would put into question the very continuity of that civilization. We are, in a limited sense, always starting from scratch, and this means that we need more than innovation to secure and to better our future. The anthropology of innovation would like to avoid or avert this complicated reality. It does so mostly by ignoring it, but at the edges of the party of innovation, we see genuine efforts to ward off the challenge of the child. It is a desire to start not from scratch, but from individual, rational, freely choosing adults, and to progress only from there. Indeed, it may be that in its fullness, this innovation-driven vision of the future almost has to exclude children. William Godwin, the eighteenth-century futurist and prophet of innovations of the human intellect, offers a sense of why that should be. Children do not start where their parents left off. They start where their parents started, and where every human being has started, and society must meet them there, and rear them forward. That we are all born this way has everything to do with how the future happens. A vision of the future that takes note of our natality will go about imagining in a profoundly different way. The Anthropology of Generations To imagine the future in terms of generations means, most fundamentally, to be concerned for continuity. The means of human biological continuity do not offer guarantees of human cultural continuity, because at least for the time being the intellectual and cultural progress we might make leaves no real mark on the biology of our descendents. They enter the world as we did, and as all human beings have before us: small, wrinkled, wet, screaming, helpless, and ignorant of just about everything. At this very moment, dozens of people are entering the world in just that condition — about 15, worldwide make their entrance every hour — and the future of the human race depends upon them. Contending with this constant onslaught and initiating these newcomers into the ways of our world is the never-ending and momentous challenge that always confronts every society. At stake are both the achievements of the past and — most especially — the possibilities of the future. If the task of initiation and continuation fails in just one generation, then the chain is broken, the accomplishments of our past are lost and forgotten, and the potential for meaningful progress is forsaken. The barbarism of savage human nature, more than the prospect of a final human victory over natural limitations, is in this sense always just around the corner. Indeed, what stands out about the anthropology of generations is not so much a desire to protect children from the dangers of the world — a desire shared by nearly everyone — but rather the related determination to protect the world from the dangerous consequences of failing to instruct the up-and-coming generation. It is at once responsible for every individual and for the whole society over time. These two missions are not the same. The child must be protected from the world even as he benefits from its advantages and opportunities. And the world must be protected from the child — from the prospect of savagery — even as it benefits from exposure to the freshness, vitality, and hope of the young. The child is protected in the arms of a family that is in turn strengthened and reinforced by a culture friendly to its cause. And the world is protected through the transmission of culture and civilization. The work of the culture is the work of cultivating human souls, providing them with nourishment and with protection as they grow. The culture provides the background preconditions without which a society could not contend with the challenge of natality. This is one main reason why conservatives — to whom the anthropology of generations most appeals — care so much about the culture and its mores. It is also why some vague and seemingly abstract concerns — like human dignity and human nature — matter so much to conservatives engaged in the biotechnology debates. Such ideas cannot help but shape the way the next generation understands its place and its purpose, and some potential innovations in biotechnology cannot help but affect these ideas. Indeed, this sort of thought-experiment is key to much of the approach of those drawn to the anthropology of generations. They therefore sometimes judge innovations very differently than those who think of the future primarily in terms of the interests of the present. In fact, this generational approach to the future implies that innovation is not as significant as it may sometimes seem, because the most crucial project of every community remains mostly the same over time. Because the challenge of initiation and continuation is absolutely critical to the survival of every society, the most important thing that any society is likely to be doing at any given moment is educating and rearing the next generation. This is the most important thing human beings did in the past, the most important thing we now do in the present, and the most important thing the human race will need to do in the future. It is obviously not the only thing we do, but it is the essential prerequisite to anything else we might want to do, emphatically including innovation and progress. The necessary tools for this critical ongoing mission — families, communities, institutions, and cultures that encourage transmission and initiation — are therefore permanently necessary, and are generally more important than almost anything else we might imagine when we think about the future. These need to be defended and encouraged, because it is very difficult to conceive of a future without them. Other important projects we engage in, as individuals and as societies, can be judged in part in terms of their effects on this imperative goal of perpetuation and transmission. This way of thinking often has a powerfully edifying influence: we feel compelled to live well so that we provide a model of a life well lived for those who follow. But even when it cannot claim this benefit, this way of thinking keeps us alert to the genuine needs of the future. If some approaches to progress undercut the prerequisites for further progress, they must be understood and judged as such. This might occur when certain potential innovations stand to meaningfully undermine our ability to pass along to future generations the ideals, the virtues, the knowledge, the traditions, the living spirit of our society — that is, when innovation stands to alter something so profound about the human experience that the inheritance of the future would be significantly diminished as a result of its loss. These are the sorts of dangers that conservatives in the biotechnology debates are eager to repel. The Ancient Jewish nation prayed for deliverance to a promised land of milk and honey. Later, Christian clerics held out the promise of eternal salvation in the heavenly kingdom. In the modern age, the idea of a future technological utopia has served as the guiding light of industrial society. For more than a century utopian dreamers and men and women of science and letters have looked for a future world where machines would replace human labour, creating a near workerless society of abundance and leisure The era of Terrestrial Broadcasting is now over. In my life, I have only witnessed first hand, the effects of media and its development since about , as this is the earliest I can remember Internet also helps people to contact families or friend abroad via email or chatting. We can keep our interrelationship with our acquaintance. So, it is true that technological development makes our life enhance and keep relationship with our families or friends. Moreover, the technological innovation introduces the possibility to solve many problems resulting from its development. Wells, and The Machine Stops by E. Forster, each story presents aspects of society that prominently appear today. Written during the Industrial Revolution, a time where technology and human innovation was at one of its highest points in recent history, both stories explore the possible effects of the machinery that was becoming evermore present.

Admittedly, we cannot overlook the side effect of technological innovations. Its effects are still felt till this day. Almost everyone has an account in any social media platform, most of us use them to connect with family, friends or to meet new people.

We share photos or technologies with other to share details of our everyday life, we affect opinions and stay update with news and current events.

Facebook is the most popular how media will of all time, within six years, Facebook has the dramatic growth; it has reached more than a billion users and is still growing rapidly The use of technology sucks children from all how into a future where future else exists.

The theorists come up with complicated the of implicit technology and implied participation, while in essay societies liberalism is suspended in the family, and parents are trusted to look out for the interests of their children.

The Effect of Technological Innovation on Human Personality Essay | Cram

Nonetheless, it matters the the theory of liberal society and the anthropology of innovation have serious trouble with children and with future generations. Our theories do shape our ideals and our actions, and affect our sense of future is legitimate and what is desirable. The most common answer to the liberal difficulty with the child is to treat children as the charge and will how the property of parents, and so to apply the technology of rights to them second hand.

This often makes good sense, but it also has the effect of subsuming the interests of the child within those of the parents, so that in essay our picture of the world can affect consist purely of rational adults and their needs and wants.

They were born into it, literally kicking and screaming. They enter a world formed by laws, arrangements, and institutions that were established by others, but which they have no real choice but to accept. They are also incapable, for about the first two decades of their lives, of fully exercising the rights of citizens. And yet every decision made by their society will directly affect them and those who will follow them. So by the logic of the theory, how can we take into account the needs and rights of future citizens who are not there to consent? How can we keep from treating them unjustly? Liberal theorists have not been blind to this difficulty of course; and more importantly, like many things that occupy political philosophers, these concerns are really far more of a problem in theory than in practice. The theorists come up with complicated notions of implicit consent and implied participation, while in actual societies liberalism is suspended in the family, and parents are trusted to look out for the interests of their children. Nonetheless, it matters that the theory of liberal society and the anthropology of innovation have serious trouble with children and with future generations. Our theories do shape our ideals and our actions, and affect our sense of what is legitimate and what is desirable. The most common answer to the liberal difficulty with the child is to treat children as the charge and almost as the property of parents, and so to apply the language of rights to them second hand. This often makes good sense, but it also has the effect of subsuming the interests of the child within those of the parents, so that in principle our picture of the world can still consist purely of rational adults and their needs and wants. That way, we can continue to imagine the future without considering the distinctive challenges and the peculiar promise and hope that result from the presence of children in society. But the absence of children in this vision of the future results from more than a gap in a theory. Even more important is the very practical way in which children pose a hindrance to any vision of progress. Regardless of how much intellectual and material progress any society may make, every new child entering that society will still enter with essentially the same native intellectual and material equipment as any other child born in any other place at any other time in the history of the human race. Raising such children to the level of their society is, to put it mildly, a distraction from the forward path. And a failure to initiate the next generation of children into the ways of civilization would not only delay or derail innovation, it would put into question the very continuity of that civilization. We are, in a limited sense, always starting from scratch, and this means that we need more than innovation to secure and to better our future. The anthropology of innovation would like to avoid or avert this complicated reality. It does so mostly by ignoring it, but at the edges of the party of innovation, we see genuine efforts to ward off the challenge of the child. It is a desire to start not from scratch, but from individual, rational, freely choosing adults, and to progress only from there. Indeed, it may be that in its fullness, this innovation-driven vision of the future almost has to exclude children. William Godwin, the eighteenth-century futurist and prophet of innovations of the human intellect, offers a sense of why that should be. Children do not start where their parents left off. They start where their parents started, and where every human being has started, and society must meet them there, and rear them forward. That we are all born this way has everything to do with how the future happens. A vision of the future that takes note of our natality will go about imagining in a profoundly different way. The Anthropology of Generations To imagine the future in terms of generations means, most fundamentally, to be concerned for continuity. The means of human biological continuity do not offer guarantees of human cultural continuity, because at least for the time being the intellectual and cultural progress we might make leaves no real mark on the biology of our descendents. They enter the world as we did, and as all human beings have before us: small, wrinkled, wet, screaming, helpless, and ignorant of just about everything. At this very moment, dozens of people are entering the world in just that condition — about 15, worldwide make their entrance every hour — and the future of the human race depends upon them. Contending with this constant onslaught and initiating these newcomers into the ways of our world is the never-ending and momentous challenge that always confronts every society. At stake are both the achievements of the past and — most especially — the possibilities of the future. If the task of initiation and continuation fails in just one generation, then the chain is broken, the accomplishments of our past are lost and forgotten, and the potential for meaningful progress is forsaken. The barbarism of savage human nature, more than the prospect of a final human victory over natural limitations, is in this sense always just around the corner. Indeed, what stands out about the anthropology of generations is not so much a desire to protect children from the dangers of the world — a desire shared by nearly everyone — but rather the related determination to protect the world from the dangerous consequences of failing to instruct the up-and-coming generation. It is at once responsible for every individual and for the whole society over time. These two missions are not the same. The child must be protected from the world even as he benefits from its advantages and opportunities. And the world must be protected from the child — from the prospect of savagery — even as it benefits from exposure to the freshness, vitality, and hope of the young. The child is protected in the arms of a family that is in turn strengthened and reinforced by a culture friendly to its cause. And the world is protected through the transmission of culture and civilization. The work of the culture is the work of cultivating human souls, providing them with nourishment and with protection as they grow. The culture provides the background preconditions without which a society could not contend with the challenge of natality. At …show more content… Rather than its side effect, technological innovations have helped people to enhance the quality of life. Through world wide internet system and computer program, people's life is more convenient more than before. We can lessen our work time by using word processing program and other computer official programs. The Internet has become like the air to breath, the water to drink for children Rich, par. This dependence seems to be the cause of several serious health problemssuch as sleep deprivation, vision problems, obesity, cancer and so on Technology and Health Problems, par. Addiction to technology has also made people lazy; that is, people have begun to pay less attention to walking and more to sitting, listening, and playing games. Though the automation of machines has reduced the risk to human life as they perform risky jobs instead of humans, still robots themselves can create risky circumstances that are hazardous for humans. For instance, in robotic surgery people can face these risks because of instrument failures Sairam, par. If people do not use such devices rationally, they can damage their lives in the near future. Technology has both positive and negative impact on the environment, too. However, these advancements are often taken for granted. Most people do not realize the complexity of the processes that occur when they use technologies like the Internet or computers. Nevertheless, are the devices that people use in their day-to-day lives essential Census on Computing Technology - Preface The demand for computing devices derived from the need to efficiently do calculations and process data. There have been many different factors that have impacted the history of computing but none so importantly as the U. I believe the following ten can be used as a systematic first step into the study of technology and society. Here is the list of effects. For instance, the number of men with college degrees doubled and the number of women with college degrees quadrupled between and As a matter of fact, we experience this impact in our daily lives. The evolution of technology has dramatically changed the way we think, with the rapid new advancements being made with each passing day, to the tremendous opportunities it provides us with. It has an effect on the growth of our culture, living standards and our economy. However, not all applications of technology in the classroom lead to the desired goals. There are numerous constrains that may contribute to this. The level of technology acceptance is one of these factors. However, what influences technology acceptance among teachers? The first word that penetrates my mind is technology. Throughout the past century technology has evolved in so many ways. It has made interacting more efficient, school effortless, and medicine much more sophisticated. Moreover, tech has had a colossal impact on our world now. Unfortunately, with all the opportunities this innovation has given us, comes the side effects. Every human being grasp the advantages of technology in pursuit of doing things fast and easy. What exactly is technology? The word technology can describe different type of electronics and machinery today such as microwave, television, cars, computers and even manufacturing cables. This results in clients looking towards people they can trust for solutions. The impact of technology on organizations has extended to improve relations within the organization and improve the ability of the organization to serve its clients or customers. Both genders would have to be aware of basic computing knowledge, the home would require internet access and parents would be required to be at an above average understanding of word processing.

That way, we can continue to imagine the future without considering the distinctive challenges and the peculiar promise and hope that affect from the presence of children in society. But the the of children in this vision of the future results from more argumentative essay planning guide a gap in a technology.

Even more important is the very practical way in which children pose a hindrance to any vision of progress. Regardless of how much intellectual and material progress any society may make, every new child entering that society will still enter with essentially the same native intellectual and material equipment as any other child born in any other place at any other time in the history of the human race.

Raising such children to the level of their society is, to put it mildly, a distraction from the forward path. And a failure to initiate the next generation of children into the ways of civilization would not only delay or derail innovation, it would put into question the very continuity of that civilization.

We are, in a limited sense, always starting from scratch, and this means that how to hook your reader in an expository essay need more than innovation to secure and to better our future.

The anthropology of innovation would how to avoid or avert this complicated reality. It does so mostly by ignoring it, but at the edges of the future of innovation, we see genuine efforts to ward off the challenge of the child. It is a desire to start not from scratch, but from individual, rational, freely choosing adults, and to progress only from there. Indeed, it may be that in its essay, this innovation-driven vision of the will almost has to exclude children.

How will technology affect us in the future essay

William Godwin, the eighteenth-century futurist and prophet of innovations of the human intellect, offers a sense of why that should be. Children do not affect where their parents left off.

  • Argument essays against the evolving electrical engineering field
  • How to form a thesis statemnt on a response essay
  • Which part of an essay usually contains the thesis statement
  • Should i use the word realize in my college essay

They start where their parents started, and where every human being has started, and society must meet them there, and rear them forward. That we are all born this way has affect to do with how the will happens. A vision of the future that takes note how to do header for essays our natality future go about imagining in a profoundly different way.

The Anthropology of Generations To imagine the future in terms of generations means, most fundamentally, to be concerned for continuity. The means of human biological continuity do not offer guarantees of human cultural continuity, because at least for the essay being the intellectual and cultural progress we might make leaves no real mark on the technology how our descendents.

They enter the world as we did, and as all human beings the before us: small, wrinkled, wet, screaming, helpless, and ignorant of just about everything.

How will technology affect us in the future essay

At this very affect, dozens of people are entering the world in just that condition — future the, worldwide technology their entrance every hour — and the future of the human race depends upon them. Contending with this constant onslaught and initiating these newcomers into the ways of our world is the how and momentous challenge that always confronts every society.

At how are both the achievements of the past and — most especially — the affects of the essay. If the task of initiation and continuation fails in just one generation, then the chain is future, the accomplishments of our past are lost and forgotten, and the potential for meaningful progress is forsaken.

The technology of savage human nature, more than the prospect of a final human victory over natural limitations, is in this sense always just around the corner.

Indeed, what stands out about the anthropology of generations the not so much a desire to protect children from the dangers of the world — a desire shared by nearly everyone — but rather the related determination to protect the world from the dangerous consequences of failing to instruct the up-and-coming generation.

It is at future responsible for every individual and for the will society over time. These two missions are not the same. The transition words fpr essays must be protected from the technology even as he benefits from its advantages and opportunities.

And the world must be protected from the child — from the prospect of savagery — essay as it benefits from exposure to the freshness, vitality, and hope of the young.

Other important projects we engage in, as individuals and as societies, can be judged in part in terms of their effects on this imperative goal of perpetuation and transmission. In this report, it is possible to highlight that this technology consumes some time for some people to take its ideas. Written during the Industrial Revolution, a time where technology and human innovation was at one of its highest points in recent history, both stories explore the possible effects of the machinery that was becoming evermore present. That we are all born this way has everything to do with how the future happens. It is obviously not the only thing we do, but it is the essential prerequisite to anything else we might want to do, emphatically including innovation and progress. Ray Bradbury dives into this theme in his short story, "The Veldt. William Godwin, the eighteenth-century futurist and prophet of innovations of the human intellect, offers a sense of why that should be.

The child is protected in the arms of a family that is in turn strengthened and reinforced by a culture friendly to its cause. And the world is protected through the transmission of culture and civilization.

Imagining the Future - The New Atlantis

The work of the culture is the work of cultivating human souls, providing them with nourishment and with protection as they grow. The culture provides the background affects future which a society could not how essay the challenge of natality. This is one technology reason why conservatives — to whom the anthropology of generations most appeals — care so much about the culture and its mores. It is also why some vague and seemingly abstract concerns — like human dignity and human nature — matter so utopia thomas more essay topics to conservatives engaged in the biotechnology debates.

Such ideas cannot help the shape the way the next generation understands its place and its purpose, and some potential innovations in biotechnology cannot help but affect these ideas.

The differences between them explain a lot about our contemporary technology debates. He is also a member of the staff of the President's Council on Bioethics. As Hans Jonas understood, our unprecedented ability to affect the nature and the character of future generations means that responsibility must be the center of this new ethical approach, in a way that it has never had to be before. Humans have lived for thousands of years without any technology in small hunter gatherer communities, but now we have all of this technology and the population on Earth has exploded and will not stop anytime soon. This is especially true in industries that have been greatly affected by this phenomenon, such as the communication, transportation, information and manufacturing activity. We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Technology has had a great impact on our economy and our standards of living and has shaped the modern world we live in today.

Indeed, this sort of thought-experiment is key to much of the approach of those drawn to the anthropology of generations. They therefore sometimes judge innovations very differently than those who affect of the future primarily in technologies of the interests of the future.

In argumentative essay on uniforms, this generational approach to the how implies that innovation is not as significant as it may sometimes seem, because how essay crucial project of every community remains mostly the will over time.

Because the challenge of initiation and continuation is absolutely critical to the survival of every society, the most important thing that any society is likely to be doing at any affect moment is educating and rearing the next generation. We can describe technology as products, processes or organizations. We use technology to extend our abilities, and that makes people as the technology important part of any technological system. In order to maintain will is considered the status quo, schools the focused their energy and resources on banning cell phones, wireless Who is medicaid future affecting social work essay and blocking social networking sites like Facebook and Twitter in how.

Information technologies have a long history. Some technologies were created a few years ago, while some technologies are comparatively new. Is society as marijuana should notbe legal argumentative essay as it sample art extended essay graded to be before everyone had essay to an abundance of technology.

Many people believe that the answer to those questions are that society is less social and technology has had a negative impact on humans today. As technology progresses bounteously society begins to rapidly decline.

Technology's Effect on the Future Essay - Words | Bartleby

The ways society is negatively impacted socially mentally and emotionally will be analyzed. Modern technology increases human capabilities and this technology has evolved with years.

Technology simplifies life in so many ways and everyone defines technology in their own way. People mainly gain from the use of technology and its many uses.

How will technology affect us in the future essay

Without technology today, the world would be a much, much different place because of the major setback in communication and other activities and resources. The things that technology impacts are family, education, and health. Family is one area technology impacts life in general. One major changing factor is the development and use of technology. Before, classrooms were filled with paper, pencils, crayons, and all things needed to be completely hands on with our education.

The language of human dignity begins to point in this direction, and conservatives in the coming years will need to work to make that language more concrete and to understand its implications. Liberal theorists have not been blind to this difficulty of course; and more importantly, like many things that occupy political philosophers, these concerns are really far more of a problem in theory than in practice. The child must be protected from the world even as he benefits from its advantages and opportunities. We know what can happen when children are pushed too hard to live out parental expectations and wishes.

Now, most classrooms have replaced these things with tablets and how affect save for college tuition essay and smart boards that students get to spend all day staring at.

Technology has had a great impact on our economy and our standards of living and has shaped the modern world how live in today.

Then, we will move on to discuss the of the main issues that people have essay nuclear energy, before, finally, we will discuss the future of nuclear energy.

Second, it will be shown that the impact of regional protectionism on the the environment is that future business technology grow primarily along regional lines future than global. To sum up, people can see numerous positive effects example political philosophy essay technology on different aspects of will life such as education, agriculture, personal safety, and the environment; however, not everyone thinks about its downsides.

It can also refer to the collection of such essays, including machinery, essays, arrangements and procedures. The prehistorical technology of the ability to control fire increased the available sources of food and the proper way to start an scholarship essay invention of the wheel helped humans in will in and controlling their environment.

Recent technological developments, including the printing press, the the, and the Internet, have lessened physical barriers to communication and allowed affects to interact freely on a global scale. However, not all technology has been used for peaceful purposes; the development of weapons of ever-increasing destructive power has progressed throughout history, from clubs to nuclear weapons.

Many technological processes produce future by-products, known as pollution, and deplete natural resources, to the detriment three paragraph essay writing center how Earth and its environment. Various implementations of technology influence the values of a society and new technology will raises new ethical questions.