Student-Friendly Text Analysis Rubric | ELA
Thinking and Inquiry Exceeding Standards Introduction grabs attention. Has clear, thought out analysis. Thesis is structured so analysis knows what the author will write and prove throughout the paper. Thesis is interesting and rubrics a great deal of thought and creativity. Concluding paragraph restates the essay and leaves the reader with an insightful grade.
Meeting Standards Thesis grade is clear. Introduction may not be as original or thought provoking. Thesis shows some thought and creativity.Progressing Towards Standards Thesis statement is included but may not clearly outline what the essay is about. An organizational pattern is evident with a clear beginning, middle and conclusion developed around a central focus or idea. In social studies, for example, an essay about geographical landforms and their effect on the culture of a region might necessitate additional criteria about the use of specific terminology.
Concluding paragraph added sugar on health essay thesis and leaves reader with a conclusion. Progressing Towards Standards Thesis statement is included but may not clearly outline what the essay is about. It doesn't have grade originality.
Error - Page Not Found
No clear purpose. Concluding paragraph doesn't restate thesis or leave reader with a concluding thought.
Does Not Meet Standards No clear analysis statement. Reader has to figure out the main topic of the essay. Disorganized or no concluding paragraph.
- How is an essay graded by a computer
- Writing a rhetorical analysis essay tips
- Integrating quotes to an analytical essay rubric
- Joan of arc analysis essay
Body Paragraphs and Organizat Thinking and Inquiry Exceeding Standards Body paragraphs which include an assertion sentence relating back to thesis.
Each grade proves the thesis. Seamless integration of essays.
No tranisitions, and organization makes it hard to read. The response is extremely well organized with a clear and logical progression neatly organized around a clear and well-articulated central idea. The aspects of writing a literary analysis response are still just teaching how to write well. So this would be my advice to teachers: Remember that you are always a writing teacher. This increases their level of awareness of the traits that distinguish successful essays from those that fail to meet the criteria. The writer offers some explanation of the text, but shows only a limited understanding, interpretation or analysis of the meaning of the work. There is now more focus on supporting all claims for scores of 3 or 4 rather than simply providing examples or evidence that may not be totally successfully linked back to a claim. An organizational pattern is evident with a clear beginning, middle and conclusion developed around a central focus or idea. Significant examples and quotations, details, and other evidence, including literary devices, from the reading are provided and are linked to the meaning and interpretation presented.
Insightful analysis of text. Clear transitions and organization. Meeting Standards Paragraphs include rubrics. Some essays are integrated into writer's own sentences, but perhaps awkwardly.
Analysis of text exists with some insight. Paragraphs have transitions but may have trouble with organization. what is the leap in the college essay Progressing Towards Standards Paragraphs have rubrics that may not relate to thesis. Transitions and organization are not very clear.
Poor integration of quotes. Lacking explanation and analysis. Does Not Meet Standards Paragraphs analysis support thesis.
Online writing helpAnd look to these descriptors for teaching ideas! Thesis shows some thought and creativity. Although there is an attempt at organization, the sequence of ideas may not have a clear logic and the focus may not be clearly evident. The aspects of writing a literary analysis response are still just teaching how to write well.
No tranisitions, and organization essays it hard to read. Quotes not integrated, or do not exist. Explanation and analysis are confusing, or absent.