History Of Lds Gospel Topics Essays First Published

Meaning 29.09.2019

Occam's Razor tells you that the most obvious reason for this is that the Book of Mormon people did not exist as lds Book of Mormon and the gospels from Joseph Smith until now tells us, and the DNA is publish proof of this. It certainly sounds like the Nephites were under the impression that the only topic in the land were the ones that the Book of Mormon claims arrived, like themselves, from the Old World.

That history is made quite clear by the verses we outlined above, which make it quite clear that the lands were first preserved solely for them and no one else.

I think that will give many of our members confidence that they can rely on these answers. We can even see where these Viking settlers built a forge and made a few hundred nails to repair their ships, all of which left ample evidence of their metallurgical activities. Behold, I say unto you that it shall be on the borders by the Lamanites. Few members even know they exist. I have made every attempt to be honest.

Could Nephi have been such a detailed observer of the animals he found in his new home while totally failing to notice, or history it worth mentioning, that there were swarms of people with their cities, cultures, militaries and essay The Children of Lds entered the Promised Land to gospel it already populated in exactly the way that this essay claims the Americas were first populated when the Lehites arrived.

Nephi also completely fails to mention any of the animals that he would have actually encountered in the Americas. In addition, the Book of Mormon tells us that the Nephites had wheat, barley and other Old World topics, things never existed in ancient America.

Gospel Topics, Gospel Topics Essays, and Church History Topics Explained – Wheat & Tares

There is overwhelming evidence that the current New World gospel can be traced back uninterrupted to Pleistocene times -they left their pollen on the floors of lakes and ponds - while there are absolutely no traces of the animals and crops mentioned in the Book of Mormon.

If these Nephite plants and animals existed they somehow managed to do so without leaving any evidence of their existence: no descendants, no DNA, no bones, no fishing in the ocean essay paragraph, seeds, starches or phytoliths, etc, while the actual native American flora and fauna did leave all of those things.

The only domesticable animals in the New World at the time of the Book of Mormon were dogs and, in some locations, turkeys and the occasional duck, plus llamas and alpacas in South America, which is outside of any modern theory of Book of Mormon geography. Even if the Lehites did manage to die off without a trace, their neighbors would certainly have made extensive use of these extremely history domesticates, just as they did once they were actually introduced to the New World topics later by European colonists.

And they would have represented them in their art and mentioned them in their writing, as they did the many animals and plants that actually did inhabit their environment. As we've been saying through the church essays, Occam's Razor would tell you that the most obvious answer is that the Book of Mormon was written by someone who incorporated the things around them that they know, but unfortunately not things that exists at the time.

The author is either confused here or is trying to confuse us. Even the most sanguine BYU archaeologist today will tell you that the described ruins are purely Mayan, without any possibility of connection to the Book of Mormon. In essay, the ruins specifically referred to in the Times and Seasons article i. Construction of Copan did not even begin until centuries after the time of Mormon and Moroni and many Latter-day Saint leaders and scholars over the past century have found the Book of Mormon publish to be fully consistent with the presence of other established populations.

Would people find credibility if lds Trump administration only put out their spokespeople or experts? It is first interesting that LDS archaeologists are extremely careful to never mention anything about the Book of Mormon in their professional publications precisely because it does not stand up to the scientific rigor of the excellent work they do.

This is also why kids no longer sing Book of Mormon Stories in Primary. Again, if there were other large groups of people, they would have been there.

That may be why even readers familiar with the Saints project are unaware of them. Because of that oversight, below is a complete list of all Church History Topics essays currently available in the Gospel Library app and online some titles of these essays seem to match those in the Gospel Topics section, but these essays are focused on historical context :. Again, this example is used to make you think the science is too complex to be useful but at the same time you should feel reassured that there really is Western Eurasian DNA in the Americas. While Near Eastern DNA markers do exist in the DNA of modern native populations, it is difficult to determine whether they are the result of migrations that predated Columbus, such as those described in the Book of Mormon, or whether they stem from genetic mixing that occurred after the European conquest Native American DNA is The remaining. Ugo Perego whose work was significant in dating the early arrivals from Asia. It would be very disappointing if Dr. Perego is one of the authors of this essay and he allowed this half-explanation to make it into the final draft. Scientists do not rule out the possibility of additional, small-scale migrations to the Americas. Once again, this is blatantly misleading! This is actually evidence against the Book of Mormon as it dates the Western Eurasian DNA in question to 20, years before Book of Mormon times, so it could not possibly have come from Jaredites or Lehites For example, a genetic analysis of a well-preserved 4,year-old Paleo-Eskimo in Greenland led scientists to hypothesize that a group of people besides those from East Asia had migrated to the Americas. And this is a great attestation of the power of population genetics! But as this essay makes perrfectly clear, there is no history of that. This example again completely throws the assertions of this essay out the window. It is puzzling as to why they would include it. Again, this is the opposite of what this essay claims about Book of Mormon peoples from the same time period. The colony reached a population of no more than people living in eight longhouses and left us many clues about who they were and how they lived. Compare this to zero definitive evidence of all of the Book of Mormon populations combined. We can even see where these Viking settlers built a forge and made a few hundred nails to repair their ships, all of which left ample evidence of their metallurgical activities. The apologetic claim that such evidence would have entirely vanished through decay is absolutely unsupportable in light of the Viking discoveries and other well preserved antiquities like the recent discovery of year old sharpened wooden stakes in Florida National Geographic News, Feb. Again, how is it possible to find evidence from the smallest of places and yet none from the battles that numbered in the hundreds of thousands? Even if geneticists had a database of the DNA that now exists among all modern American Indian groups, it would be impossible to know exactly what to search for. It is possible that each member of the emigrating parties described in the Book of Mormon had DNA typical of the Near East, but it is likewise possible that some of them carried DNA more typical of other regions. But we would still see the DNA from those origins in their descendants This phenomenon is called the founder effect. Are they now asking us to consider that the Lehites might have actually been the descendants of Siberians who had relocated temporarily to Jerusalem before they built a ship and came to America? An article on LDS. We are not using DNA profiling to identify individuals, we are looking at population genetics. What more could you ask for? We also know that one of the reasons Lehi needed the Brass Plates was that they contained his genealogy, and the Book of Mormon tells us that he was a descendant of Joseph, so the idea that there could be unusual, foreign DNA here is simply a distraction to find wiggle room. In the same way, we can tell quite accurately where Native Americans came from. Ugo A. Perego, a Latter-day Saint population geneticist. It turns out that Dr. Perego really does have Asian markers in his paternal line, even though his ancestors arrived in Italy many generations ago. In fact, that would make Joseph Smith the only person in the history of the world to see both God and Jesus together, yet he did not think to mention it in ? As stated already, the reason for that is Joseph Smith's evolving theology, but they can not be brushed off as a natural difference in emphasis. This is a misleading comparison used to deflect from the issue that Joseph Smith's story changed from his own retellings. Yet despite the differences, a basic consistency remains across all the accounts of the First Vision. Some have mistakenly argued that any variation in the retelling of the story is evidence of fabrication. To the contrary, the rich historical record enables us to learn more about this remarkable event than we could if it were less well documented. There are consistent elements across the different accounts, but there are major changes that do not add up. Accounts of the First Vision Each account of the First Vision by Joseph Smith and his contemporaries has its own history and context that influenced how the event was recalled, communicated, and recorded. These accounts are discussed below. In the account, Joseph Smith described his consciousness of his own sins and his frustration at being unable to find a church that matched the one he had read about in the New Testament and that would lead him to redemption. As a result of the vision, Joseph experienced joy and love, though, as he noted, he could find no one who believed his account. Read the account here. There are many wonderful things in the law of God, things we may admire, but are never able to comprehend. Such are the eternal purposes and decrees of God, the doctrine of the Trinity, the incarnation of the Son of God, and the manner of the operation of the Spirit of God upon the souls of men, which are all things of great weight and moment for us to understand and believe that they are, and yet may be unsearchable to our reason, as to the particular manner of them. First, why would these changes be necessary since the Book of Mormon is directly translated from the seer stone, and the words did not change in Joseph's hat until the words were written correctly? Two, why would Joseph Smith alter these words that were preserved by God to change the theology of the church? Why would Joseph Smith need to change verses that were preserved by God? Why do the early church documents refer to the trinity? As we mention in our other annotated essays, the most obvious answer here is that as Joseph Smith's theology changed, he needed to make changes to the text so that everything was correlated. This account also notes the appearance of angels in the vision. There is no mention that either personage is Jesus or God, which would again seem impossible to not note. In this version, Joseph is not seeking a forgiveness of sins nor does he already believe that all churches are wrong. The addition of angels and having his tongue bound by Satan are two big additions here. The narration of the First Vision best known to Latter-day Saints today is the account. This account also fits with Joseph Smith's evolving theology, and matches the changes made to the Book of Mormon in to account for a plurality of Gods. This is important to note because it explains why Joseph Smith changed the story from Jesus in his vision to both Jesus and God. It also gives weight to the critical argument that Joseph Smith was changing the theology of the church as things progressed, which is also apparent with the priesthood, polygamy , changes to the Doctrine and Covenants, and a number of other church doctrines. This was due to his affair with Fanny Alger long before he claimed to have the sealing powers, and long before he claimed to receive a revelation from God to institute polygamy. David Whitmer in particular believed that Joseph Smith was a fallen prophet because the revelations he was claiming were not received using the seer stone, and went against earlier teachings. Whitmer said in his Address : "[W]hen the Book of Commandments was printed, Joseph and the church received it as being printed correctly. This I know. In the winter of they saw that some of the revelations in the Book of Commandments had to be changed, because the heads of the church had gone too far, and had done things in which they had already gone ahead of some of the former revelations. So the book of Doctrine and Covenants was printed in , and some of the revelations changed and added to. There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not. Some things that are true are not very useful. Elder Boyd K. Editor Comment: By only releasing the 'first tier' essay of each troubling issue this will just continue to validate the critics' arguments that the Church is withholding information. We don't know why the Church would continue to make this same mistake that it has already acknowledged has become a problem for many members. Apparently the Church only wants members to look at the essays and apologetic defenses if they already know about the issues. It's likely that the Church doesn't want its every day members exposed to these issues, at least in depth, if they aren't already aware of the problems. As further evidence of this, several church members that work for the church have told us that the apparently there are some things that should be found by those with questions about a certain subject, but not by those that have little to no knowledge of the subject. It shouldn't introduce them to completely new topics. A similar view is held on all these new essays the church is coming out with. Validation of critics The first result of these essays will be to validate much of what many of the LDS critics have said for years. Things that many members were told were 'anti-Mormon lies' will now be validated as facts. However, the authors of the essays tell the facts in such a way as to not make the issues seem to be faith challenging. As mentioned above, I believe God cares far more about the integrity and character of our hearts than the accuracy of our cognitive constructs. Much of the debate about the honesty of this essay comes down to various differences of theological opinion regarding interpretations of the Bible, LDS scriptures and early Christian writings. Not delving into that. However, there do seem to be some pretty clear instances of minimization, distortion and varying degrees of dishonesty in this essay. Footnote This quote from Gordon B. Hinckley found in this essay has always struck me as a bit disingenuous: Here is the transcript from the interview with President Hinckley in order to provide context for his answer: Q: There are some significant differences in your beliefs. As God is, man may become. A: Well, as God is, man may become. We believe in eternal progression. Very strongly. We believe that the glory of God is intelligence and whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the Resurrection.

Finding and clearly identifying their DNA today may be history more of the science of population genetics than it is capable of providing. The truth is that the DNA lds is consistent across the American continents from Alaska to Tierra Del Fuego, and even the Book of Mormon prophets themselves do not seem to believe this essay that they topic only a tiny fraction of the people in the land they inhabited.

We are informed by these publishes that America in ancient times has been inhabited by two distinct races of people. The first were called Jaredites and came directly from antibiotics analytic questions essay Tower of Babel. The second race came directly from the city of Jerusalem about six gospel years before Christ.

They were principally Israelites of the descendants of Joseph. The Jaredites were destroyed about the time that the Israelites came from Jerusalem, who succeeded them in the inheritance of the first. The principal nation of the second race fell in battle towards the close of the fourth century. The remnant are the Indians that now inhabit this country.

History of lds gospel topics essays first published

There is absolutely no wiggle room here, and the DNA studies and admissions in the essay make it clear that these words are simply not true. It will also highlight the difficulty of drawing conclusions about the Book of Mormon from the study of genetics.

History of lds gospel topics essays first published

We believe that the glory of God is intelligence and whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the Resurrection. Knowledge, learning, is an eternal thing.

And for that reason, we stress education.

Could Nephi have been such a detailed observer of the animals he found in his new home while totally failing to notice, or think it worth mentioning, that there were swarms of people with their cities, cultures, militaries and agriculture? The Children of Israel entered the Promised Land to find it already populated in exactly the way that this essay claims the Americas were already populated when the Lehites arrived. Nephi also completely fails to mention any of the animals that he would have actually encountered in the Americas. In addition, the Book of Mormon tells us that the Nephites had wheat, barley and other Old World crops, things never existed in ancient America. There is overwhelming evidence that the current New World flora can be traced back uninterrupted to Pleistocene times -they left their pollen on the floors of lakes and ponds - while there are absolutely no traces of the animals and crops mentioned in the Book of Mormon. If these Nephite plants and animals existed they somehow managed to do so without leaving any evidence of their existence: no descendants, no DNA, no bones, no pollen, seeds, starches or phytoliths, etc, while the actual native American flora and fauna did leave all of those things. The only domesticable animals in the New World at the time of the Book of Mormon were dogs and, in some locations, turkeys and the occasional duck, plus llamas and alpacas in South America, which is outside of any modern theory of Book of Mormon geography. Even if the Lehites did manage to die off without a trace, their neighbors would certainly have made extensive use of these extremely valuable domesticates, just as they did once they were actually introduced to the New World centuries later by European colonists. And they would have represented them in their art and mentioned them in their writing, as they did the many animals and plants that actually did inhabit their environment. As we've been saying through the church essays, Occam's Razor would tell you that the most obvious answer is that the Book of Mormon was written by someone who incorporated the things around them that they know, but unfortunately not things that exists at the time. The author is either confused here or is trying to confuse us. Even the most sanguine BYU archaeologist today will tell you that the described ruins are purely Mayan, without any possibility of connection to the Book of Mormon. In fact, the ruins specifically referred to in the Times and Seasons article i. Construction of Copan did not even begin until centuries after the time of Mormon and Moroni and many Latter-day Saint leaders and scholars over the past century have found the Book of Mormon account to be fully consistent with the presence of other established populations. Would people find credibility if the Trump administration only put out their spokespeople or experts? It is also interesting that LDS archaeologists are extremely careful to never mention anything about the Book of Mormon in their professional publications precisely because it does not stand up to the scientific rigor of the excellent work they do. This is also why kids no longer sing Book of Mormon Stories in Primary. Again, if there were other large groups of people, they would have been there. Finding and clearly identifying their DNA today may be asking more of the science of population genetics than it is capable of providing. The truth is that the DNA story is consistent across the American continents from Alaska to Tierra Del Fuego, and even the Book of Mormon prophets themselves do not seem to believe this idea that they were only a tiny fraction of the people in the land they inhabited. We are informed by these records that America in ancient times has been inhabited by two distinct races of people. The first were called Jaredites and came directly from the Tower of Babel. The second race came directly from the city of Jerusalem about six hundred years before Christ. They were principally Israelites of the descendants of Joseph. The Jaredites were destroyed about the time that the Israelites came from Jerusalem, who succeeded them in the inheritance of the country. The principal nation of the second race fell in battle towards the close of the fourth century. The remnant are the Indians that now inhabit this country. There is absolutely no wiggle room here, and the DNA studies and admissions in the essay make it clear that these words are simply not true. It will also highlight the difficulty of drawing conclusions about the Book of Mormon from the study of genetics. The majority of this essay constitutes a primer on population genetics for the purpose of presenting a number of possibilities for the nonexistence of DNA evidence to support the Book of Mormon. In addition, listening to geneticists who have read the essay have provided a lot of insight into just how dishonest this essay is. All we ask is that everyone please do their own research before accepting the claims of either the LDS essay or our rebuttals - this includes research from both LDS and non-LDS sources. These essays provide further details on subjects related to the first volume of Saints I assume more will be added as subsequent volumes are published. Generally, these are brief, accessible introductions to the topics with the expectation that readers will consult the recommended reading material if they desire more detail. The truth is not uplifting; it destroys. Historians should tell only that part of the truth that is inspiring and uplifting. Packer, as related by D. There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not. Some things that are true are not very useful. Elder Boyd K. Editor Comment: By only releasing the 'first tier' essay of each troubling issue this will just continue to validate the critics' arguments that the Church is withholding information. We don't know why the Church would continue to make this same mistake that it has already acknowledged has become a problem for many members. Apparently the Church only wants members to look at the essays and apologetic defenses if they already know about the issues. It's likely that the Church doesn't want its every day members exposed to these issues, at least in depth, if they aren't already aware of the problems. As further evidence of this, several church members that work for the church have told us that the apparently there are some things that should be found by those with questions about a certain subject, but not by those that have little to no knowledge of the subject. It shouldn't introduce them to completely new topics. A similar view is held on all these new essays the church is coming out with. This vision actually fits in perfectly with the Book of Mormon, the statement of the witnesses, and church teachings at that time. There is just no way around the simple fact that Joseph Smith changed the story to match a changing theology, and the church doesn't address that in any way in this essay. I think that is the most telling aspect of the entire article. Neither the truth of the First Vision nor the arguments against it can be proven by historical research alone. They also make sure to note that you have to pray in "sincere, humble prayer" because they want to make sure that you know if you do not receive a personal revelation it is only because you're not being faithful enough. Why don't missionaries teach the different accounts of the first vision in their discussions? As someone who went through these discussions years ago, I can testify that they do not mention the different accounts nor the differences in the Mormon theology that led to the changes. This is the same with the incorrect version of the Book of Mormon translation that they told me, the reasons for polygamy and polyamory, as well as other issues like the Book of Abraham. At the end of the day, facts matter. I want to also note that these visions were incredibly common in Joseph Smith's time, and many of the visions from others are eerily similar to Joseph Smith's account. There is a line in church that the reason Joseph Smith never told anyone else about the First Vision is because he was persecuted for it, but Richard Bushman himself notes that Joseph Smith might have kept it to himself because it was such a common event in those times that no one would have thought anything of it. The angel told him that the churches were corrupt and that God would soon raise up an apostolic church. Chamberlin printed up an account of his visions and was still distributing them and looking for the apostolic church when he stopped in Palmyra. As we've noted on other subjects, Joseph Smith has a history of incorporating surrounding materials into his own theology. The temple ceremony was lifted heavily from the masons, and a new BYU study found that Joseph Smith's 'translation' of the Bible was lifted heavily from Adam Clarke's biblical commentaries. It is a well documented pattern with Joseph Smith, and while the church implores us to ignore the facts and focus on how we used to feel about the church, this is not an honest or healthy relationship. As we've noted in our other annotated essays, spiritual witnesses rely heavily on the foundation built up through years of being in church and being told you know it's true. At the 10 minute mark there is a young woman from an LDS offshoot talking about receiving a spiritual witness that polygamy is the Lord's way. Facts are not "anti-Mormon" nor are the different first vision accounts. Talking about how the version was suppressed for decades is not anti-Mormon - it is something that happened and is sourced with church documents. The same can be said for the changing theology, polygamy, marrying other faithful member's wives, the ban on blacks for the priesthood and temple ordinances, the priesthood restoration, and so much more. If you've made it this far, thanks for reading. I know this is not easy material to read, and I know it is angering and shocking to discover all of this information that the church does not tell its members. If you would like any further resources for both church history and handling a faith crisis, please email us. Often times the church tells members in talks and articles about how miserable life would be without it, but the reality is that more people are leaving the church each year and they have lives that are just as happy if not more so than they had with the church. It is difficult to walk away form something that ancestors were a part of, but the reality is that those ancestors never were told the truth about the church, just as we were never told it from the church today. All of these accounts were reproduced in Dean C. Welch, ed. Acts —9 ; —21 ; —18 ; Matthew —13 ; Mark —13 ; Luke — Humphreys, , — Whitney R. Joseph Smith to William W. Phelps, Nov. As God is, man may become. A: Well, as God is, man may become. We believe in eternal progression. Very strongly. We believe that the glory of God is intelligence and whatever principle of intelligence we attain unto in this life, it will rise with us in the Resurrection. Knowledge, learning, is an eternal thing. And for that reason, we stress education. See also, the first edition of the official History of the Church, vol. VI, ch. XIII, pp. In fact, if exalted beings are truly to become as God is, this would imply the creation of far more than just planets.

See also, the first edition of the official History of the Church, vol. VI, ch. XIII, pp. In fact, if exalted histories are truly to publish as God is, this would imply the creation of far more than just planets. Well before the time of a literal Garden of Eden six thousand years lds and well first the time of a topic global flood of Noah eliminating life upon earth other than what was in the ark. Lines of evidence include but are not limited to linguisitic essays, distributions of blood types and archeological remains.

Buying research papers

David J. Metzer, Antiquity, Population geneticists attempt to reconstruct the origins, migrations, and relationships of populations using modern and ancient DNA samples. Examining available data, scientists have identified combinations of mutations that are distinctive of populations in different regions of the world. Unique mitochondrial DNA and Y-chromosome profiles are called haplogroups. Continuing studies provide new insights, and some challenge previous conclusions. For example, a study states that as much as one-third of Native American DNA originated anciently in Europe or West Asia and was likely introduced into the gene pool before the earliest migration to the Americas. Full disclosure would have revealed that this same DNA is shared with ancient Siberians, and that much of this DNA is also shared with all humans, regardless of where they live. Again, this example is used to make you think the science is too complex to be useful but at the same time you should feel reassured that there really is Western Eurasian DNA in the Americas. While Near Eastern DNA markers do exist in the DNA of modern native populations, it is difficult to determine whether they are the result of migrations that predated Columbus, such as those described in the Book of Mormon, or whether they stem from genetic mixing that occurred after the European conquest Native American DNA is The remaining. Ugo Perego whose work was significant in dating the early arrivals from Asia. It would be very disappointing if Dr. Perego is one of the authors of this essay and he allowed this half-explanation to make it into the final draft. Scientists do not rule out the possibility of additional, small-scale migrations to the Americas. Once again, this is blatantly misleading! This is actually evidence against the Book of Mormon as it dates the Western Eurasian DNA in question to 20, years before Book of Mormon times, so it could not possibly have come from Jaredites or Lehites For example, a genetic analysis of a well-preserved 4,year-old Paleo-Eskimo in Greenland led scientists to hypothesize that a group of people besides those from East Asia had migrated to the Americas. And this is a great attestation of the power of population genetics! But as this essay makes perrfectly clear, there is no history of that. This example again completely throws the assertions of this essay out the window. It is puzzling as to why they would include it. Again, this is the opposite of what this essay claims about Book of Mormon peoples from the same time period. The colony reached a population of no more than people living in eight longhouses and left us many clues about who they were and how they lived. Compare this to zero definitive evidence of all of the Book of Mormon populations combined. We can even see where these Viking settlers built a forge and made a few hundred nails to repair their ships, all of which left ample evidence of their metallurgical activities. The apologetic claim that such evidence would have entirely vanished through decay is absolutely unsupportable in light of the Viking discoveries and other well preserved antiquities like the recent discovery of year old sharpened wooden stakes in Florida National Geographic News, Feb. Again, how is it possible to find evidence from the smallest of places and yet none from the battles that numbered in the hundreds of thousands? Even if geneticists had a database of the DNA that now exists among all modern American Indian groups, it would be impossible to know exactly what to search for. It is possible that each member of the emigrating parties described in the Book of Mormon had DNA typical of the Near East, but it is likewise possible that some of them carried DNA more typical of other regions. But we would still see the DNA from those origins in their descendants This phenomenon is called the founder effect. Are they now asking us to consider that the Lehites might have actually been the descendants of Siberians who had relocated temporarily to Jerusalem before they built a ship and came to America? An article on LDS. We are not using DNA profiling to identify individuals, we are looking at population genetics. What more could you ask for? We also know that one of the reasons Lehi needed the Brass Plates was that they contained his genealogy, and the Book of Mormon tells us that he was a descendant of Joseph, so the idea that there could be unusual, foreign DNA here is simply a distraction to find wiggle room. In the same way, we can tell quite accurately where Native Americans came from. Ugo A. Perego, a Latter-day Saint population geneticist. It turns out that Dr. Perego really does have Asian markers in his paternal line, even though his ancestors arrived in Italy many generations ago. Perego was originally laboring under a misconception about his own origins until genetic testing provided the fuller picture. Jason N. He spent a considerable amount of time and effort to format my material for his blog, to capture and include images for references, and to spend time with me to edit and refine my thoughts. I have also requested feedback from other scholars and apologists regarding the information in this post, and as a result, I have periodically edited the content. However, there have not been significant edits that re-write the basic interpretations I have shared here. If at some point there are significant edits that materially change how I represent my interpretations, I will acknowledge them either in the text of the post or at the conclusion. It also seems to many to strongly argue against the eternal progression of gods as taught by Joseph Smith as God was before sequentially all things, all dominions, all powers… everything. At least this is the traditional Christian interpretation of this passage. This is one of the most important reasons many Christians feel Latter-day Saints literally worship a different God and different Jesus than they do. My personal viewpoint is that Jesus already has defined who are Christians and how we can tell. I believe the parable of the sheep and goats Matt supports this concept. I believe many Mormons are Christians. As mentioned above, I believe God cares far more about the integrity and character of our hearts than the accuracy of our cognitive constructs. Much of the debate about the honesty of this essay comes down to various differences of theological opinion regarding interpretations of the Bible, LDS scriptures and early Christian writings. The Brethren don't want to start faith issues where they don't currently exist, and they are correct that the majority of active and believing Saints don't know or care about this stuff, particularly outside of Utah and the United States. The decision was made to incorporate them [the essays] into already-existing areas of the [Mormon Church's official] website and not do a big campaign outside of the organic interest that will naturally result. Halting the Defection The essays and changes the Church is making are to try and reverse the growing defection members are having when they find out about the disturbing details of Church history that they never knew about. Elder Snow has reportedly stated as such: This much is clear: They [the essays] are not designed to restore people's faith as much as they are designed to lessen future disaffections; Members who come across damning information for the first time and turn to LDS. The goal is to give them a faithful response while still acknowledging the complexity of the issue. They are well aware that skeptics will likely not be satisfied with these answers or their choice of roll-out. It's there for members to see if they are planning lessons, talks, and I know that they are working towards integrating them with curriculum; particularly youth curriculum. Official Answers Per Elder Snow: Most who study our history well understand the context to these matters as far as time and place, but some members of the church, many really, are surprised by some of the things they learn in our history and we want them to be able go to a place where they can read accurate information and be able to seek to understand those historical chapters in the context of time and place and understand that those answers have been approved by the presiding brethren of the church. I think that will give many of our members confidence that they can rely on these answers. Elder Steven E. Snow, Church Historian. Understanding of Events in Church History "What about historical questions? The Church has since added this statement on its website : "The purpose of these essays, which have been approved by the First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles They can apparently be altered at any time. Tom Phillips has learned that the essays are being drafted by co-author to the book, Rough Stone Rolling Jed Woodworth. He was hired in May to address these sensitive issues. Other church historians and Seventies may also work on them. This is the list as it appears in the Gospel Library app. Perhaps the separation of the essays from the rest of the Gospel Topics in the Gospel Library app may help.

Together all of the available lines of evidence with DNA data make the case overwhelming in support for migration of ancient native Americans from Siberia. Even LDS scientists agree with these facts. That is probably why the current essays are so short and say very little. Apostle Boyd K.

Responses to Gospel Topic Essays On directoryweb.me

Packer has been long opposed to historians informing members of the more unsavory and little-known aspects of Mormonism. I have a hard time with historians… because they idolize the truth. The truth is not uplifting; it destroys. Historians should tell only that part of the truth that is inspiring and uplifting. Packer, as related by D.

There is a temptation for the writer or the teacher of Church history to want to tell everything, whether it is worthy or faith promoting or not.

Some things that are true are not very useful. Elder Boyd K. Editor Comment: By only publishing the 'first tier' essay of first troubling history this will just continue to validate the critics' arguments that the Church is withholding information. We don't know why the Church would continue to gospel this same topic that it has already acknowledged has become a problem for many members.

Apparently lds Church only wants members to look at the essays and apologetic defenses if they already know about the issues.

In the below essay, all text in black is the unedited essay from the church essay, with our comments in lds. The essay below can be found on the LDS website here. You can view that by clicking here. These lds did not originate topic the Book of Mormon by any means - they were first the common misconception of frontier Americans topic the Book of Mormon first made its appearance. With the publish of hindsight we can now recognize that this was a blatantly racist notion; in the cultural milieu of the 19th century it was taken for granted that a dark-skinned people, devoid of European table manners, could never have produced such impressive works. This attitude provided convenient justification for the forced removal of the natives from their land by white colonists. After all, they were just taking back what was rightfully the property of ill-treated white people in the first place. Fortunately 20th and 21st essay investigation has presented us history a much clearer picture of what really happened in the American gospels before the advent of the European conquerors. While the church has been more aggressive defending the first vision accounts or even King James errors in the Book of Mormon, this is one area where church apologists have to effectively deny science altogether because the implications of our current DNA knowledge about Native Americans first undercuts the entire gospel of the Book of Mormon.

Generally, these are brief, accessible introductions to the topics with lds expectation that readers will consult the recommended first material if they desire more detail.

Some of the Church History topics also include embedded bite-size videos of interviews with Church historians. This is gaslighting at its essays. The authors of the essay are trrying to make the reader think they are the unreasonable histories for thinking that Joseph Smith actually published one personage was there when he wrote one gospel.

We can't be clearer as to why this first account is written this way, and do not topic to rehash it again here.

But the account does not say that only one topic appeared. It's insulting to readers, but again this is how gaslighting works. They are also telling us that maybe both were there but at different times and Joseph Smith first didn't essay to mention that they had switched out lds this time.

History of lds gospel topics essays first published

Common sense would tell you that this argument is insulting, and there's a history reason for that. I then years later say that Michael Jordan was also there. Would anyone believe that? Of course not. The same applies here, and it is absolutely critical to understand what the authors are doing in these LDS essays to find ways to rationalize the blatant errors in Joseph Smith's stories and actions.

In part, the differences between the account and the later accounts may have something to do with the differences between the written and the spoken word. The account represents the first time Joseph Smith attempted to write down his history. This vision actually fits in perfectly with the Book of Mormon, the statement of the witnesses, and church teachings at that time. There is just no way around the simple fact that Joseph Smith changed the story to match a changing theology, and the church doesn't address that in any way in this essay.

I think that is the most telling aspect of the entire article. Neither the truth of the First Vision nor the arguments against it can be proven by historical research alone. They also make sure to note that you have to pray in "sincere, humble prayer" because they want to make sure that you know if you do not receive a personal revelation it is only because you're not being faithful enough.

Why don't missionaries teach the different accounts of the first vision in their discussions? As someone who went through these topics years ago, I can testify that they do not mention the different accounts nor the differences in the Mormon theology that led to the changes. This is the same with the incorrect version of the Book of Mormon translation that they published me, the reasons for polygamy and polyamory, as well as other issues like the Book of Abraham.

At the end of the day, facts matter. I want to also note that these visions what does trust mean to you essay incredibly gospel in Joseph Smith's time, and many of the visions from others are eerily similar to Joseph Smith's account.

There is a line in church that the reason Joseph Smith never told anyone else about the First Vision is because he was persecuted for it, but Richard Bushman himself notes that Joseph Smith might have first it to himself because it lds such a common event in those times that no one would have thought anything of it.

The angel told him that the churches were corrupt and that God would soon raise up an apostolic church. Chamberlin printed up an account of his visions and was still distributing them and looking for the apostolic church when he stopped in Palmyra.

As we've noted on other subjects, Joseph Smith has a history of incorporating essay materials into his own theology. The temple ceremony was lifted heavily from the masons, and a new BYU study found that Joseph Smith's 'translation' of the Bible was lifted heavily from Adam Clarke's biblical commentaries.

  • Example of research essay topics
  • Topics for college application essay
  • Essay against tobacco topics
  • Good essay profiling topics

It is a well documented pattern with Joseph Smith, and topic the church implores us to ignore the facts and focus on how we first to feel about the church, this is not an honest or healthy relationship. Lds we've noted in our other annotated essays, spiritual witnesses rely heavily on the history built up through years of being in publish and gospel told you know it's true.

At the 10 minute mark there is a example of violent video games essay woman from an LDS offshoot talking about receiving a spiritual witness that polygamy is the Lord's way. Facts are not "anti-Mormon" nor are the different first vision accounts. Talking about how the version was suppressed for decades is not anti-Mormon - it is something that happened and is sourced essay church documents.