The fact that she went her essay in the s and the topic is still being discussed upon up until leaves her arguments more valid and strong which is may involve convincing to the targeted audience.
New Dearborn: W. Norton, How to learn this page Choose silly format:. For most men college gets them to where they do to be, but with hard work and punctuality going to work right after high physical can take you a long way. Baker out of high school and fragrance a career early might be what some critics want, but college is always an option with all the leading they have today.Suggestions for further research can lead directly from the limitations. What should be the strategy of sparing time for manuscript writing be? This can be followed by any recommendations for further research.
The greatest problem with this study, however, was compliance. Before concluding the discussion, identify potential limitations and weaknesses. Keywords: Academic writing, discussion section, writing a manuscript Introduction Sharing knowledge produced during academic life is achieved through writing manuscripts. Explain the Meaning of the Findings and Why They are Important No one has thought as long and hard about your study as you have. How should the intermediate paragraphs of the Discussion section be formulated?
On the other hand, manuscript writing process should begin before the completion of the study even the during project stage. The Content The content of the discussion section of your paper most often includes: Explanation of results: comment on whether or not the results were expected and present explanations for the results; go into greater depth when explaining findings that were unexpected or especially profound.
This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results than being part of the general research you cited to provide context and background information. Remember that not all of the questions or the stages will be relevant to every experiment.
NOTE: Besides the literature review section, the preponderance of references to sources is usually found in the discussion section. In addition, each subject only consumed either the high- or low-cholesterol diet and a cross-over study in which each subject consumed both diets for 12 weeks would have improved the validity of the data. If more than one unexpected finding emerged during the study, describe each them in the order they appeared as you gathered the data. Think about the overall narrative flow of your paper to determine where best to locate this information. What is significant or important about your results? Each paragraph should not contain more than words, and hence words should be counted repeteadly.
When writing the discussion section, you should carefully consider all possible explanations for the study results, rather than just those that fit your prior assumptions or biases. Describe the generalizability of your results to other situations, if applicable to the method chosen, then describe in detail problems you encountered in the method s you used to gather information.
This can include re-visiting key sources already cited in your literature review section, or, save them to cite later in the discussion section if they are more important to compare with your results than being part of the general research you cited to provide context and background information.
In addition, a pre-peer review process is recommended to obtain feedback on the manuscript. Besides the target journal to be selected should be ready to accept articles with similar concept. Follow a logical stream of thought. Therefore, the authors should go over the manuscript for at least three times after finalization of the manuscript based on joint decision. This result should be interpreted with caution because each of the 3 subjects used in the analysis for the high-cholesterol group finished the study with an identical plasma cholesterol concentration of 8 mM probably coincidentally. Especially before writing the manuscript, the most important step at the start is to construct a draft, and completion of the manuscript on a theoretical basis.
What Should be in the Discussion Section?
One guideline for staging the discussion is shown here based on extracts from the discussion in one of the cholesterol reports. Ask yourself these questions: Do your results agree with previous research? Organization and Structure Keep the following sequential points in mind as you organize and write the discussion section of your paper: Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid.
Many writers confuse the information they should include in their discussion with the information they should place in their conclusion. If you feel compelled to speculate, be certain that you clearly identify your comments as speculation or as a suggestion for where further research is needed. Be wary of mistaking the reiteration of a specific finding for an interpretation because it may confuse the reader.