If only researchers in your field are likely to want to read your study, then a field-specific journal would be best. It is likely that those journals may also be interested in your work. State the problem 2. You can ask your peers or professors to review your paper. Follows your contribution and the simulated results. This is a newer system, but called out for specific focus in the upcoming U.
Then once you gain a level of confidence, you can proceed to international conferences and journals. Conferences offer rapid time-to-publish, plus you will often get feedback on your work when you present it. This ranking can be very important to anthropologists employed in four-field anthropology programs, combined departments such as combined anthropology and sociology programs , or a psychology, education, medicine, or public health department. If your goals of publishing are related to academic advancement, evaluate the reputation of the journal. The conferences will accept papers which details about the comparison of existing technologies, mathematically proven but practically unproven proposals, etc. Do share your experience with us by leaving a comment below!
Be Positive If your paper is rejected, keep trying! You should also consider how long a journal takes to publish articles.
A journal's Impact Factor is one measure of its reputation, but not always the most important. In fact, anything aside from simply "reject," Neal-Barnett reminds, is a positive review. Submitting and publishing research articles in peer-reviewed journals can be perplexing for scholars of all levels, and junior scholars often have few resources to assist with navigating the process. You will often find that reviewers make criticisms that are off-target because they misinterpreted some aspect of your paper. Remember, every task you complete gets you closer to finishing your paper.
Find the Right Journal One of the first steps in choosing the right journal is to know its scope and aim. With all these tools, the selection process can be streamlined. Say what your solution achieves 4. A journal's Impact Factor is one measure of its reputation, but not always the most important. DOAJ: It is considered to be the most authentic database of open access journals. If so, don't let it get to you -- just rewrite that part of your paper more clearly so that the same misunderstanding won't happen again.
Don't panic After reading the review the first time, put it aside. You should consider the prestige of the authors that publish in the journal and whether your research is of a similar level. I suggest four considerations for creating your personal shortlist. If your goals of publishing are related to academic advancement, evaluate the reputation of the journal.
There are thousands of active research journals. The reputation of the journal. Have you used any of these or other platforms in your search for the right journals? Next is to find the right place to publish it. Wrong sequence in Figure and Table numbering Misalignment of columns Usage of figures from another paper without credit and permission
That way, if your paper is rejected from your first-choice journal, you can quickly submit to your second-choice journal. You can ask your peers or professors to review your paper. Read the reviews carefully This is really, really, really hard. This process means that of almost 3, suggested journals per year, only about will be added to Scopus.
FindMyJournal : It helps researchers select the most appropriate journal to publish their manuscript. Many deans also value the prestige associated with publishing in Impact Factor-ranked journals, because it helps them compare scholars from multiple disciplines. What are your personal requirements: Does the journal usually publish articles quickly; is the "time to publication" important for you? If your article is a scholarly one, and you want it to have the best chance to be read by other scholars, you will want to look at the pages on the journal's website that list where the title is abstracted and indexed. It's frustrating to have a paper rejected because of a misunderstanding, but at least it's something you can fix. Additionally, email the editor and ask for the time range of their review process.
I suggest four considerations for creating your personal shortlist.
Follows your contribution and the simulated results. I suggest four considerations for creating your personal shortlist. Find the right journal If you know the name of the journal you want to submit to, view all journals.
You can also get information from your literature review. When looking for suitable journals in which to publish your own results, start with what you have read.