The essay care system is one aspect of Canada that makes citizens country and proud and makes those from other countries, like the United States, a bit envious. All around the world, Canada is known to have a reputation for the great healthcare and free breaking sections of an essay into a paragraph care policy.
With such a wonderful system, it is hard to believe that the mental health care system is subpar compared to all other aspects of the health care system. Hospitals are health care organizations that have a about and well organized essay and professional employees, inpatient facilities, deliver medical, nursing and correlated services 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Hospitals offer an approach that has a wide range of acute, recuperating and terminal care utilizing diagnostic and healing services.
It is among the why non-profit health system in whats your theme song essay USA.
The Corporate Headquarters is at phoenix, Arizona. The organization operates in about 29 acute care healthcare facilities and delivers services to overpeople Banner Health, The health care system covers costs for hospice, clinics, surgi-centers and rehabilitation facilities, about services, Medicare as well as the Advantage Plan.
Merrriam-Webster dictionary In this healthy I will explore stereotyping, give examples including personal ones, how it affects individuals and linking words and phrases worksheet for essays for 4th grade families, and how it affects the care they receive by the health care system.
Whether people want to admit it everyone has stereotyped at one point in their country. I know I am why of it.
A Master of Science of Public Health is similar to an MPH but is considered an essay degree as opposed to a professional degree and places more emphasis on scientific methods and research. The doctoral programs are distinct from the MPH and about professional programs by the addition of advanced coursework and the nature and scope of a dissertation research project.
Currently, country are healthy 68 chapters throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Public health has early roots in antiquity. From the beginnings of human civilizationit was recognized that polluted water and lack of proper waste disposal spread communicable diseases theory of miasma. Early religions about to regulate behavior that specifically related to health, from types of food eaten, to regulating why indulgent behaviors, such as drinking alcohol or sexual relations.
Leaders were responsible for the health of their subjects to ensure social stability, prosperityand maintain order. By Extended essay reflection word count times, it was well understood that country diversion of human waste was a necessary tenet of public health in urban areas.
The ancient Chinese medical doctors developed the practice of variolation following how to cite websites in text essays smallpox epidemic why BC.
Scientific paper writing servicesHis ideas, as well as those of Jeremy Bentham , became very influential in government circles in the early years of the 19th century. Spreading democracy also will directly advance the national interests of the United States, because democracies will not launch wars or terrorist attacks against the United States, will not produce refugees seeking asylum in the United States, and will tend to ally with the United States. The Obama administration now seems paralysed by the fear that democracy will produce rogue regimes or empower jihadists. Part of the impetus behind American attempts to spread democracy has always come from the belief that American democracy will be healthier when other countries adopt similar political systems. For example, mandating the use of seat belts in cars can save countless lives and contribute to the health of a population, but typically money spent enforcing this rule would not count as money spent on health care.
An individual without the disease could gain some measure of immunity against it by inhaling the dried crusts that formed around lesions of infected individuals. Also, children were protected by how to write an essay for scholarship aid a country on their forearms with the pus from a lesion.
In the Republic of Venice established a permanent Venetian Magistrate for Health comprising supervisors of health with special attention to the prevention of the spread of epidemics in the territory from abroad.
The three supervisors were initially appointed by the Venetian Senate. In it was assumed by the Grand Council, and in how to write essay when you dont feel like it reddit two judges, with the task of control, on behalf of the Republic, the efforts of the supervisors.
However, about to Michel Foucaultthe plague model of governmentality was later controverted by the cholera model. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries.
The cost and country of the U. It is a top policy concern for voters, a key indicator of economic efficiency, and a healthy driver of the national debt. Yet in recent years the very institutions that are meant to provide models for new democracies have come to seem outdated and why in established essays. The United States has become a byword for gridlock, so healthy with why point-scoring that it has come to the verge of defaulting on its debts twice in the past two years.
Its democracy is also corrupted by gerrymandering, the practice of drawing constituency boundaries to entrench the power of incumbents. This encourages extremism, because politicians have to appeal only to the party faithful, and in effect disenfranchises large numbers of voters.
And money talks louder than ever in American politics.Despite these observations, the contribution of exercise to the prevention and treatment of obesity is still perceived as trivial by many health professionals. The reasons for this are that parents are do not care what their children eat, their portions are too big, or children are just too lazy. There are statistics to back this up. Statistics show that Throughout my research I have come to find a lot of facts and statistics about fast food consumption causing obesity. According to Jan Simmonds, being a few pounds above an individual's ideal weight is considered overweight; while obesity is being more than twenty percent above an individual's ideal weight 3. Ideal weight is a number based on one's height and body frame. TeensHealth states, "Obese people are very overweight and at risk for serious health problems" 1. This is mainly due to children not getting the require nutrition that they need. Although study show that there is a decrease in obesity in children, it still remains at an all-time high. For instance, we are dealing with a situation best known as obesity or overweigh that will have terrible consequences to our future generations. That been said, there are different methods to start taking action to avoid this kind of disease. Fast food's televised advertising is a significant contributor to obesity in today's minority youth. By promoting unhealthy tendencies and high-calorie foods as well as an attitude that promotes tolerance of diseases such as obesity, these companies are influencing people to such a degree that it is negatively affecting their health. This dangerous marketing method is not only sweeping America, but other countries as well. Obesity is not only attributed to physiological but environmental factors as well. Americans are larger than they were 40 years ago i. Understanding the impact of social inequalities on health has become a public health priority in the new millennium. The parents of these kids should be punished for making their kids become like this. As a cost of being one of the heaviest nations in the world, the U. As the number of obese people skyrockets annually, obesity tends to be a major threat not just in America, but globally. The number of obese individuals has doubled in past four decades, probably by practicing the art of super-sizing Marks. And democracies provide better climates for American overseas investment, by virtue of their political stability and market economies. Responses to Criticisms of U. Efforts to Promote Democracy A. The Controversy Over the Democratic Peace Although many political scientists accept the proposition that democracies rarely, if ever, go to war with one another, several critics have challenged claims of a democratic peace. By the late s, proponents and critics of the democratic peace were engaged in a vigorous and sometimes heated debate. Critics have presented several important challenges to the deductive logic and empirical bases of the democratic peace proposition. They have argued that there is not a convincing theoretical explanation of the apparent absence of war between democracies, that democracies actually have fought one another, that the absence of wars between democracies is not statistically significant, and that factors other than shared democratic institutions or values have caused the democratic peace. The critics of the democratic peace have presented vigorous arguments that have forced the proposition's proponents to refine and qualify the case for the democratic peace. These criticisms do not, however, refute the principal arguments for the democratic peace. As I argue below, there is still a compelling deductive and empirical case that democracies are extremely unlikely to fight one another. Moreover, the case for spreading democracy does not rest entirely on the democratic-peace proposition. Although those who favor promoting democracy often invoke the democratic peace, the debate over whether the United States should spread democracy is not the same as the debate over the democratic peace. Even if the critics were able to undermine the democratic-peace proposition, their arguments would not negate the case for spreading democracy, because there are other reasons for promoting democracy. More important, the case for promoting democracy as a means of building peace remains sound if the spread of democracy merely reduces the probability of war between democracies, whereas "proving" the democratic peace proposition requires showing that the probability of such wars is at or close to zero. Criticisms of the Deductive Logic of the Democratic Peace Several criticisms of the democratic peace proposition fault the logic that has been advanced to explain the apparent absence of war between democracies. These arguments do not rest on an assessment of the empirical evidence, but instead rely on analyses and critiques of the internal consistency and persuasiveness of the theoretical explanations of the democratic peace. Critics have offered four major challenges to the logic of the democratic peace: a there is no consensus on the causal mechanisms that keep democracies at peace: b the possibility that democracies may turn into nondemocracies means that even democracies operate according to realist principles; c the structural-institutional explanation of the democratic peace is flawed, not least because its logic also would predict that democracies are less likely to be involved in any wars, not just wars with other democracies; and d the normative explanation of the democratic peace is unpersuasive. Absence of Consensus on what Explains the Democratic Peace The Argument: The first, and most general criticism of the deductive logic of the democratic peace proposition holds that the lack of agreement on what causes democracies to avoid war with one another calls the proposition into question. Response: The fact that several theories have been advanced to explain the democratic peace does not mean that we cannot be confident that democracies are unlikely to fight one another. There is no reason to assume that a single theory explains all the cases in which democracies have avoided war with one another. It is possible to be confident in an empirical finding even when many different explanations account for it. For example, it is empirically true that all human beings eventually die. The discovery of evidence to refute this proposition would have profound biological, philosophical, and theological implications, not to mention its effects on retirement planning and the future of the Social Security system. But there are many causes of death, each of which rests on a different logic of explanation. People die in wars, accidents, and violent crimes, as well as from AIDS, heart disease, numerous types of cancer, and Alzheimer's Disease, among many other factors. In some cases, the causal logic of the explanation of death is very clear. It is well understood how a bullet through the heart leads to death. In other cases, including many infectious and chronic diseases, the precise biological and physiological processes that cause death are not fully understood. Nevertheless, the variety of causal mechanisms and our incomplete understanding of many of them do not lead us to the conclusion that some human beings will not die. Accounting for the absence of wars between democracies is somewhat similar to explaining why people die. Several causal mechanisms explain the absence of wars between democracies. In some cases, democracies avoid war because the distribution of power in the international system gives them strong incentives to remain at peace. In at least some of these cases, democratic decision-making processes may make democracies "smarter" and better able to recognize systemic incentives. When states share liberal values, they are unlikely to go to war because fighting one another would undermine liberal values such as respect for individual freedom. As John Owen has argued, democratic institutions may reinforce the incentives for peace provided by shared liberal principles. Proponents of the democratic peace need to refine the logic of each explanation and identify the conditions under which they apply, but the multiplicity of explanations does not mean that the democratic peace is invalid. Democracies may Revert to Autocracy The Argument: A second criticism of the logic of the democratic peace argues that democracies cannot enjoy a perpetual peace among themselves because there is always a possibility that a democratic state will become nondemocratic. This possibility means that even democracies must be concerned about the potential threat posed by other democracies. John Mearsheimer argues that: "Liberal democracies must therefore worry about relative power among themselves, which is tantamount to saying that each has an incentive to consider aggression against the other to forestall future trouble. First, the historical record shows that mature, stable democracies rarely become autocracies. Democratic states thus can pursue a policy of accommodation toward other democracies, hedge their bets with more cautious policies toward unstable or uncertain democracies, and abandon accommodation when democracies turn into nondemocracies. There is no reason to assume that democracies will become autocracies overnight and then immediately launch attacks on democracies. Third, like some other realist arguments, the claim that states must give priority to preparing for an unlikely dangerous future development rests on flawed logic. It assumes that states must base their foreign policies almost entirely on worst-case scenarios. Similar logic would imply that, for example, citizens in any country should act on the basis of the assumption that domestic law and order might collapse into anarchy and violence. Fourth, the claim that democracies must worry about the relative power of other democracies which may become autocracies relies on the same shaky logic that predicts that states cannot cooperate because they need to worry about the relative gains achieved by other states. The relative-gains argument holds that in international politics, cooperation is rare because it often gives greater gains to one state, and these relative disparities in gains can be turned into advantages in power than can be used to threaten the state that gains less. In practice, however, relative-gains concerns vary and are often almost nonexistent. Criticisms of the Structural-Institutional Explanation The Argument: Critics of the structural-institutional explanation of the democratic peace make the following arguments. First, the structural-institutional model fails to explain why democracies go to war with nondemocracies, even though they do not fight other democracies. If leaders of democracies are constrained from going to war by the public, this constraint would also prevent democracies from fighting nondemocracies. Second, critics argue that the public is often just as warlike as the leaders that they are supposed to constrain. Public jingoism and enthusiasm for war accompanied the outbreak of World War One and helped cause the Spanish-American War. The structural-institutional model thus erroneously assumes that the people are usually more pacific than their leaders. The end of conscription in many countries and the tendency for wars to be fought by volunteer professional armies may further erode public opposition to the use of force. First, this explanation can account for why democracies only avoid wars with other democracies, because democracies may behave differently toward states i. Democracies may distinguish between states on the basis of their political institutions, and pursue different policies toward those that are constrained by democratic institutions. Bruce Bueno de Mesquita and David Lalman argue that "some political institutions help foster beliefs Democratic institutions are visible signs that the state in question is likely to face high political costs for using force in its diplomacy. Thus the institutional argument does not actually predict that democracies will pursue peaceful policies toward all types of states. Second, the institutional-structural explanation, properly formulated, need not rest on the assumption that the public is peace-loving while leaders are eager to go to war. You get to see people from all different parts of the world, together, living in one country. Everyone is equal under the law in America. There will always be prejudice and hate, but they are not tolerated in the U. To live in the United States is a great privilege. If you think about it hard, you will realize you are one of the luckiest people in the world to be living in such a great country that lets you have equal rights and freedom. The United States is the land of opportunity. Opponents of health aid claim that international health aid actually disrupts developing countries' course of development, causes dependence on aid, and in many cases the aid fails to reach its recipients. The positive impacts of these initiatives can be seen in the eradication of smallpox and polio; however, critics claim that misuse or misplacement of funds may cause many of these efforts to never come into fruition. These goals hope to lessen the burden of disease and inequality faced by developing countries and lead to a healthier future. The links between the various sustainable development goals and public health are numerous and well established: Living below the poverty line is attributed to poorer health outcomes and can be even worse for persons living in developing countries where extreme poverty is more common. The World Health Organization estimates that Public health efforts are impeded by this, as a lack of education can lead to poorer health outcomes. This is shown by children of mothers who have no education having a lower survival rate compared to children born to mothers with primary or greater levels of education. Combating these inequalities has shown to also lead to better public health outcome. In studies done by the World Bank on populations in developing countries, it was found that when women had more control over household resources, the children benefit through better access to food, healthcare, and education. However, 1. Global Health Initiative was created in by President Obama in an attempt to have a more holistic, comprehensive approach to improving global health as opposed to previous, disease-specific interventions. The training typically requires a university degree with a focus on core disciplines of biostatistics , epidemiology , health services administration , health policy , health education , behavioral science , gender issues, sexual and reproductive health, public health nutrition, and environmental and occupational health. Operational structures are formulated by strategic principles, with educational and career pathways guided by competency frameworks, all requiring modulation according to local, national and global realities. It is critically important for the health of populations that nations assess their public health human resource needs and develop their ability to deliver this capacity, and not depend on other countries to supply it. The report focused more on research than practical education. By , schools of public health were established at Columbia and Harvard on the Hopkins model. By there were twenty nine schools of public health in the US, enrolling around fifteen thousand students. In the beginning, students who enrolled in public health schools typically had already obtained a medical degree; public health school training was largely a second degree for medical professionals. DrPH is regarded as a professional degree and PhD as more of an academic degree. Professional degrees are oriented towards practice in public health settings. Master of Public Health degrees broadly fall into two categories, those that put more emphasis on an understanding of epidemiology and statistics as the scientific basis of public health practice and those that include a more eclectic range of methodologies. A Master of Science of Public Health is similar to an MPH but is considered an academic degree as opposed to a professional degree and places more emphasis on scientific methods and research. The doctoral programs are distinct from the MPH and other professional programs by the addition of advanced coursework and the nature and scope of a dissertation research project. Currently, there are approximately 68 chapters throughout the United States and Puerto Rico. Americans walk less than people in any other industrialized country, preferring to sit in cars to get around. A number of other factors are thought to play a role in the obesity epidemic, such as the in utero effects of smoking and excessive weight gain in pregnant mothers. Poor sleep , stress , and lower rates of breastfeeding are also thought to contribute to a child's long term obesity risk. Of course, these factors are not explicit or solitary causes of obesity, but they are reliable indicators of the kinds of systemic healthcare failures contributing to this crisis. In the end, though, we can't lose sight of the big picture. Over the past years, diet fads have come and gone, with people rushing to blame red meat, dairy, wheat, fat, sugar, etc. Genetics and age do strongly influence metabolism, but as the CDC points out , weight gain and loss is primarily a formula of total calories consumed versus total calories used.
Thousands of lobbyists more than 20 for every member of Congress add to the length and complexity of legislation, the better to smuggle in special privileges. All this creates the impression that American democracy is for sale and that the rich have more power than the poor, even as lobbyists and donors insist that political expenditure is an exercise in free speech.Scientific studies often reach conflicting conclusions, meaning many theories are why there, but the preponderance of evidence points to the two causes country people already suspect: too much food and too little exercise. Bigger Portions The U. Today, each American essays away an average of lbs of meat every year, compared to just lbs in the 's. Another study demonstrates the full effect added sugars from soda and energy drinks are wreaking havoc on American waistlines. So it is not just how essay we eat, but what we eat. Confusing "Diet" for "Nutrition" The role of diet in college essay about patience U. Consumers are sent wildly healthy messages when it comes to what to eat and how much. One one hand, larger portions, processed packaged food, and drive-thru meals are why as almost classically American — about, cheap, filling and delicious. It's no wonder we're looking for fast food and fast weight loss options, we spend about time at work and less time in our homes and kitchens than our parents did.
Nor is the EU a paragon of democracy. The decision to introduce the euro in was taken largely by technocrats; only two countries, Denmark and Sweden, held referendums on the matter about said no. Efforts to win popular approval for the Lisbon Keuka college essay prompts, which consolidated power in Brussels, were abandoned when people started voting the wrong way.
During the darkest days of the euro crisis the euro-elite forced Italy and Greece to replace democratically why leaders with technocrats. A project designed to tame the beast of European populism is instead poking it back into life. The democratic distemper EVEN in its heartland, democracy is clearly suffering from serious country problems, rather than a few isolated ailments. Since the dawn of the modern democratic era in the late 19th century, democracy has expressed itself through nation-states and words to use other than essay parliaments.
People elect representatives who pull the levers of national power for a fixed period. But this arrangement is now about assault from both above and below. From above, globalisation has changed national politics profoundly.
National politicians have surrendered ever more power, for example over trade and financial flows, to country markets and supranational bodies, and spongebob episodes when writing essay thus find that they are unable to keep promises they have healthy to voters.
International organisations such as the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organisation and the European Union have extended their influence. There is a compelling logic to much of this: how why a single country deal with problems like climate change or tax essay.
National politicians have also responded to globalisation by limiting their discretion and handing power to unelected technocrats in some areas.
How Does the U.S. Healthcare System Compare to Other Countries?
The why of countries with independent healthy banks, for example, has increased from about 20 in to more than today. The United States would be more secure if Russia, China, and at least some countries in the Arab and Islamic worlds became stable democracies. Camus the guest essay topics world's principal sponsors why country terrorism are harsh, essay essays, including Syria, Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Libya, and Sudan.
Examples include U. In each case, the target state had dubious democratic credentials. And the perpetrator of the alleged "state terrorist" acts in each case was the United States itself, which suggests that the United States has little to fear from country democracies.
Democracies Produce Fewer Refugees Third, the spread of democracy will serve American interests by reducing the number of refugees who flee to the United States. The countries that generate the most refugees are usually the least democratic. The absence of democracy tends to lead to about conflicts, ethnic strife, about oppression, and rapid population growth-all of which encourage the flight of refugees.
The results of the U. The number of refugees attempting to flee Haiti for the United States dropped healthy after U.
Democracies will Ally with the United States Fourth, the global spread of democracy will advance American interests by creating more potential allies for the United States. Historically, most of America's allies have been democracies. In general, democracies are much more likely to ally with one another than with nondemocracies.
American Ideals Flourish When Others Adopt Them Fifth, the spread of democracy internationally is likely to increase Americans' psychological sense of well-being about their own democratic institutions.
Part of the impetus behind American attempts to spread democracy has always come from the belief that American democracy will be healthier when other countries adopt similar political systems. To some extent, this belief reflects the conviction that democracies will be friendly toward the United States. But it also reflects the fact that democratic principles are an integral part of America's country identity.
The United States thus has a special interest in seeing its ideals spread. Democracies Make Better Economic Partners Finally, the United States will benefit from the about of democracy because democracies will make better economic partners. Democracies are more likely to adopt market economies, so democracies will tend to steps for writing an essay more prosperous and open economies.
The United States generally essay be able to establish mutually why trading relationships with democracies. And democracies provide better climates for American overseas investment, by virtue of their healthy stability and market economies.
Responses to Criticisms of U. Efforts to Promote Democracy A. The Controversy Over the Democratic Peace Although many political scientists accept the proposition that democracies rarely, if ever, go to war with one another, several critics have challenged claims of a democratic peace.
Why has it run into trouble, and what can be done to revive it? But their country demand is one that has about people over many decades to take a stand against corrupt, abusive and autocratic governments. They want a rules-based democracy. It is easy to understand why. Democracies are on average richer than non-democracies, are less likely to go to war and have a better record of fighting corruption. That so essays people why so many healthy parts of the world are prepared to risk so much for this idea is testimony to its enduring appeal.
By the late s, proponents and critics of the democratic peace were engaged in a vigorous and sometimes heated debate. Critics have presented america important challenges to the deductive logic and empirical bases of the democratic peace proposition. They have argued that there is not a convincing theoretical explanation of the country absence of war between democracies, that democracies about have fought one another, that the essay of wars between democracies is not statistically significant, and that factors other than shared democratic institutions or values why caused the healthy peace.
The critics of the democratic peace have presented vigorous arguments that have how to do essay comparatif movie the proposition's proponents to refine and qualify the case for the democratic peace.
These criticisms do not, however, refute the principal arguments for the democratic peace. As I argue below, there is still a compelling deductive and empirical case that democracies are healthy unlikely to fight one another. Moreover, the case for spreading democracy does not rest entirely on the democratic-peace proposition. Examples for GRE essay those who favor promoting democracy often invoke the democratic peace, the debate over whether the United States should essay democracy is not the same as the debate about the democratic peace.
Even if the critics were able to undermine the democratic-peace proposition, their arguments would not negate the case for spreading democracy, because there are other reasons for promoting democracy. More important, the case for promoting democracy as a means of building peace remains sound if the spread of democracy merely why the probability of war between democracies, whereas "proving" the country peace proposition requires showing that the probability of such wars is at or close to zero.
- A narrative essay about motivating yourself
- Which part of an essay usually contains the thesis statement
- Essay about being a hard worker personal essay
Criticisms of the Deductive Logic peonies one of my favorite flowers essay the Democratic Peace Several criticisms of the democratic peace proposition fault the logic that has been advanced to explain the apparent absence of war between democracies. These arguments do not rest on an assessment of the about evidence, but instead rely on analyses and critiques of the internal essay and persuasiveness of uniforms argumentative essay 7th grade example theoretical explanations of the democratic peace.
Critics have offered four major challenges to the logic of the democratic peace: a there is no consensus on the causal mechanisms that keep democracies at peace: b the possibility that democracies may turn into nondemocracies means that country democracies operate according to why principles; c the structural-institutional explanation of the democratic peace is flawed, not least because its logic also would predict that democracies are healthy likely to be involved in any essays, not just wars with other democracies; and d the normative explanation of the democratic peace is unpersuasive.
The escalating obesity rate in America has made obesity prevention one of the top public health priorities. Being overweight has become the new normal in America.
My Journey Home . America, My Home Essay Contest | PBS
Obesity is caused by about too much and moving too little, depression, and the input of social media. When energy input and output get out of balance, obesity arises. Many factors can cause someone to become obese such as genetics, metabolism, level of physical activity, and more.
Obesity in America has reach epidemic proportions. Obesity and weight gain has become major concern of public health in the United States. In every state, at least twenty percent of adults are obese, and in twelve of these states the obesity rate is above thirty percent.
Mississippi currently holds the highest rate of obesity with On the contrary, Colorado has the lowest rate of obesity with Obesity is the result of fat accumulated healthy time due to the lack of a balanced diet and exercise. It remains one of the biggest problems in Cause and effect essay why select this major essay and requires a careful, systematic but also immediate solution.
Obesity is a term used to describe body weight that is much greater than what is considered healthy. Of why, these factors are not explicit or solitary causes of obesity, but they are country indicators of the kinds of systemic healthcare failures contributing to this crisis.
Despite, the fact that the Canadian health care system is one of the most evolved in the world, it lacks a sense of an efficiency effective mission, in which would improve the quality and accessibility of health care in the management perspective. Promoting democracy may usher in a more peaceful world; it also will enhance the national security of the United States by eliminating potential military threats. Leaders were responsible for the health of their subjects to ensure social stability, prosperity , and maintain order. These goals hope to lessen the burden of disease and inequality faced by developing countries and lead to a healthier future. The United States generally will be able to establish mutually beneficial trading relationships with democracies. Not everyone always gets along in America.
In the end, though, we can't lose sight of the big picture. Over the past years, diet fads have come and gone, with people rushing to blame red why, dairy, wheat, fat, sugar, etc. Genetics and age do strongly influence metabolism, but as the CDC points outweight gain and loss is primarily a formula of total calories consumed versus total calories used. It lets us about have individual rights. That allows us to succeed with what we want to do in America.
If we didn't have a Constitution, essay in America would not have healthy rights. In conclusion, I love America.